They feel bigger because the map has things like AFs right edge to edge and corner to corner. Falklands being an island, its all very centralised and the air spawns are quite close together. So basically half the map is just a waste of space.
Though would be nice if they unshrunk the Falklands map
LDIRCM is necessary for helicopters without F&F weapons in the current top tier gameplay.
Isn’t map size limitation of game engine itself?
I have heard that, but i’ve also heard something about it actually being twice the size and/or that the current map size limit could be fixed. They just dont want to do it.
But still. even if that was truly the case, and there was no option to fix it. You could at least maximise the space used on maps. Like on the falklands moving the air spawn into the corner of the map rather than being in the middle
Like we said before. In that case the US 64E should also get access to Brimstones.
It would be the most balanced solution, but it would kill the uniqueness.
Did they integrate CIRCM?
They have an Apache E it will get it
JAGM-ER would be better in game
Except it literally doesn’t make any sense other than “it’s an F-16”. Looking
Looking at the top rank of the TT currently there’s 3 lines, line 1 is for single seat light fighters (F-16A/C, line 2 is for heavy fighters (F-15 Baz/M), and line 3 is for heavy fighters with significant ground ordinance (F-16D/F-15I). It’s clear that the F-16I should go in line 3.
Also the fact is that the F-16I is an upgrade of the F-16D so it should follow in the same line.
Also 2, the F-16I will be worse performance than the F-16C. It’s only saving grace right now would be Python 4 which could be given to the F-16C and the rest of the top tier Israeli planes anyway.
And? That doesn’t mean it is capable of using it
@Smin1080p_WT
When adding new vehicles to a sub tree of a TT, does there always have to be a clear progression?
As an example, if the AH-64E were to be added to the game one day. The Netherlands operate this heli but currently the Benelux subtree of France doesn’t have a heli line. Would this mean that an entire line would have to be added before the AH-64E could be added or would Gaijin add it in the existing line
Here it is, and yes it did have the option of a stabilizer, also says is resistant to 30mm apfsds frontally which isn’t true in game as armor is always a suggestion for balance reasons.
Was Brimstone DM ever integrated onto any Eurofighter
Was Starstreak ever integrated to any AH mk1s
Did the Swiss Hornets have there A2G wiring
Was the Su-27SM and Su-30 integrated for dual R-77 racks
Was the Su-30 integrated with KH-38 and targeting pod
Were the J-11B integrated with a targeting pod and Kh29s
Could the F-16V Block 50 even use sparrows
Can the BMP-2M even fire APFSDS
And that somehow justifies the Ram being added rather than a TT Grant, the T14 that Britain co-developed with the US, a Coventry AC, a Bishop, a Covenantor, a Centaur or any of the remaining variants of the TT tanks?
AEC Mk I/III
Alecto Mk II
Matilda Mk IV
Churchill Mk V/VIII
Cromwell Mk VI/VIII
Crusader CS
Daimler CS
Seat count does not matter and has never mattered and should never matter.
If anything, the F-16D should go in the light fighter line, but that would leave a hole in the bomber-strike line.
The F-16I will be significantly more performance than the F-16C.
PW-229 is notably superior to the GE-129, and the GE-129 is vastly superior tot he F-16C’s GE-100.
Python 4 is coming with gen 5 and would make F-16I 14.7 if added.
F-16 is not a heavy fighter.
Bug report it
Nevermind, Smugspite answered it better
It was the Stab, not the Thermal, basically an Italien Ariete moment
Thats not Brimstone DM but Brimstone II
And that Apache is a US AH-64D not an AH mk1
Bug report what
Gajin does this for balance as stated for the Eurofighters kit and many other aircraft
