air battles missed it badly
Except the “skippable” ones would be the target ones.
For example; say the majority of people want the F-15E with 229 engines. If you add F-15E with 220 engines, and the 229 one in a folder… sure, folders and all… but the one who wants the actually good variant with 229 engines has to grind through lots of extra RP and SL over more hours because they have to grind a variant that’s flat out worse than the plane they actually want.
It would take more frequent and significant decompression updates, something Gaijing isn’t apparently willing to do, lol.
We should already be sitting at 15.0 for Air and Ground, and 10.0 for Naval. Yet here we are… celebrating a 0.3 decompression step every 9 months at best.
People laughed at me when I said rank 9 could be coming soon but the American tree at rank 8 is getting too much. You can move the F-16C, F/A-18C Late and the F-15E to rank 9 and add the F-14D ect.
1 Like
Gaijin could put WWII planes back into the game like the exotic Savoia-Marchetti SM.93
2 Likes
I mean then just grind it out? It’s half off on RP and since most pepegas buy premiums that nothing compared to all the hours spent playing the same boring plane over and over again. I dont see the issue there.
Simple reason: People ask for more and more advanced stuff, not decompression. That and more premiums cause catering to people with zero skill is gaijins forte
Yeah, Italy has a lot of unique looking designs.
Yet these won’t come unfortuantly, since the meta has shifted towards “top tier”.
E.G. look at Japan, some of its most produced WWII aircraft are still not in the game.
1 Like
But more and more advanced stuff should come with decompression by default;
For example, it makes no sense that Leopard 2A7V sits at the exact same BR as Leopard 2A5… the moment 2A7V came, it should have been placed in a brand new, higher BR, along with other 2A7s and the 122s, etc (as well as some of the already ingame vehicles if they weren’t artificially gimped).
1 Like
Well, i am fully agree with it. Also small note: Germany must have some more uparmored leos too…
3 Likes
Yeah, it’s funny how to this day Sweden is still a better Germany than Germany, hahah.
Then again, the rest of the nations would also need either new MBTs, or have their current MBTs fixed too, in terms of armor and survivability.
The Merkava Mk.4s general existence, the holes in Type 10’s cheeks, the missing spall liners on Chinese MBTs, missing LFP liners on the Challenger 2/3s, etc.
4 Likes
nah the worthless filler versions should be the one in folders. If I want an F-15E for example I should just be able to go for the current one in game without having to go for the shitty waste of time version first.
I kinda hope it becomes Japans 13.0 or even 12.7 ARH slinger depending on the missile count.
would definitly be cool for SIM.
Still wouldn’t stop them making it a premium. They like giving Britain aircraft significantly worse than anything as a premium. Look at the F4JUK.
But yes. A 14.0 F18 is a waste of time
1 Like
Many issues around with all tech. Reports staying considered for years and so on. Of course others need new tech to compete. I am not against it, but balance surely needed
1 Like
Well, many ideas i have for improving that, but surely it will be only heard by you guys on forum, but not devs…
Do not forget the drifty nature of the Type 10. Every attempt of just a slight turn results in a severe loss of speed and often makes the tank drift, even tho when you look at any video with the Type 10 turning, it is smooth, basically no speed loss (unless it’s going near max speed), no drifting. Type 90 handles much better.
And regarding the armour, it should be much better too. By weight, the Type 10 has much more of it than Type 90, despite the Type 90 in game being better armoured.
3 Likes
Oh, yeah, I only mentioned armor and survivability factors- mobility is a whole additional can of worms lmao
I fear that they will add detailed guts and modules to Type 10 without touching any of the tank’s issues and inaccuracies… that will make the tank about as survivable as Ariete (which is very likely wrong too), maybe even less.
2 Likes
Yeah, just like they did with the Abrams.
Turret basket, bigger and new modules… but oh, God forbids they would fix the turret rings, fuel tank bulkheads, and SEP and SEPv2’s turrets.
1 Like
Despite all the issues with Type 10, my biggest issue and dissapointment with Japan is the Tan-SAM kai… so many missing features, so many bugs, so many inaccuracies… despite bug reports as old as the first Leviathans dev server… Gaijin has so far done basically nothing to make the system even close in efficiency to the other new 12.0 SPAAs, namely the IRIS-T SLM. SPYDER is the same story.
1 Like
Well we already have 3 of those. And besides missiles, things would be older or newer standard in general so things like radar and CFT and BOL, TGP’s, having or not having HMD are all different
There’s also folders