We don’t really have any bombers they will add after the 111C, so it make sense to group the Australian stuff after that then grinding multiple lines
Still a T-55, not having much to do with USSR didn’t stop Gaijin from adding the L-39ZA, same thing with Moderna
M55 for Soviets? Is this the M-55S
Yes, the Slovenian one
Where SU-30MKI at?
See Gszabi’s reply earlier:
Glad to see it, I’ve been looking forward to that one for awhile.
Sometimes the self sabotage capabilities of the british mains are wildly impressive. They have an empire that can get them access to some of the best aircraft currently in game, and what do they ask for? A Hornet.
So? that entire branch is bombers, it’s better to maintain the theme than have a weird little Aussie bubble at top tier. And what other planes could slot into the naval branch?
but everyone wants the Jet with the best ballistic performance for the year 1949
with the Hornet that theme is perfectly maintained
Two wrongs don’t make a right
Nowhere it’s a little fun to add to the spices : P
Good way to make people grind bombers eh lol
only to find the worst one at the top
@Smin1080p_WT Are there any updates regarding the strategic bomber mission test? Or about the development of the SEAD mission, if we can expect another test?
And they also have the gall to attack heavily modified “made custom for that country then adopted later by the original developer” designs as copy-paste slop xD
China Air players in shambles following round 2 of no J10C.
In other news oh God why 3 F18’s in the UK tree… One would have been cool, two a bit much, but three? Just a bit much imo.
I imagine two will be the same situation as the US - an earlier one with SARH and a later one with AMRAAM. Would slot in nicely into the naval line. Not sure about that third one though…
T58 being premium was to be expected, but why do they have to add three fricking Hornets to Britain?
I can already see them denying the Cheetah and Tejas because they think we have too many planes at that rank…