Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

Not entirely true, the hull I believe was the same hull the M103 used, and there are pictures of the turret being mounted to the hull.

2 Likes

They intended to use a different, unique hull though, didn’t they?

When nations like China get vehicles such as the F-16 or the Mirage from other nations, that’s fine. First of all, China needs more vehicles, and secondly, the F-16 is no longer the top vehicle for the USA, just as the Mirage 2000 is no longer the top vehicle for France.

But when it comes to India, it can’t truly be a sub-tree for just one nation. India operates the Su-30 (top-tier USSR), Rafale (top-tier France), Apache (top-tier USA), along with Jaguars, Mirages, MiG-29s, and more.

If India is added to the USSR, it wouldn’t be fair, because the USSR doesn’t need more vehicles, and the inclusion of the Rafale and Apache under the USSR tree would undermine the uniqueness of the USA and France. On the other hand, if India is added to the UK, then the Su-30 and Rafale would undermine the USSR and France.

India simply uses too many top-level vehicles from different nations for it to be a fair sub-tree without damaging another nation’s uniqueness. Honestly, it would be better not to add any Indian vehicles at all until a full independent tech tree can be created. But we all know Gaijin has already said they won’t focus on adding new tech trees for a while, at least until the existing nations have become more competitive.

1 Like

Just dont add india for a good amount of time

There should be some helicopters going off of the CM Disclosure. But no idea what ones. Probably just some C&P but with slightly different weapons.

Sadly Gaijin thinks India doesn’t have enough vehicles to be a standalone TT

that stupid Bomber/strike aircraft killing task.
Most stupid and annoying task they have ever made for the battlepass.

Didnt they use the same logic with Israel, yet here we are

1 Like

honestly it has more variation that Israel, but its fine, just don’t add India all together
either add India as a standalone or don’t add it
Adding it as a sub tree will rise so many issues

nations like pakistan and bangladesh can be added to china as they primerily use chinese aircrafts
while south africa is fine in britain (ignore gripen)

for now leaving india is the best option

1 Like

Im sure this has been addressed about a hundred times now

And it will be another 100 until gaijin gets their grip

2 Likes

The Hornet MKIII was my saviour for that task. Especially for the bombers. You get an air spawn, good climb rate, good guns, and it’s pretty fast at alt.

1 Like

I’m not entirely sure, but based off what I know, no. I believe this was when they were developing the M103.

I can’t find anything that supports it. Everything only talks about the hull it was mounted on.

T58

1 Like

yea it has, but someone brought it up so i just shared my views, as a Indian

im better off not having India as whole rather than ruining uniqueness of nations

I honestly dont think anyone would mind it if India were to become its own tree instead of a subtree if it would start around rank 6 or so (i dont know entirely what kinds of vehicles they have and in which specific eras so rank 6 was my best guess lmao) just make it require rank 5/6/7 in the UK or Russia ground tree

Seems real to me, unlike Gaijin’s Panther II, which is literal fantasy a mish mash of multiple proposals and post war pipe dreams with a dash of bad history for spice, The only constructed Panther II is this hull, that was fitted with a Panther G turret by the Americans for display purposes.,

4 Likes


it could start well from rank 2-3

british left a lot of military equipment to india and also usa gave some more as well

J-35J devblog today?

Hell yeah, gaijin could cook but choose to let it mold