So you would launch them in tws then it creates a cw beam from that?
It has DL for mid course, and SARH for terminal. Still, the radar needs constant lock in order to guide it, so if the target is lost, the missile will do nothing.
It has multi track. Not TWS per se.
SARHs are coded as ARHs who needs your lock on a whatever thing. They would track as long as you are locking smth, so we can lock - fire - switch lock very fast - fire 2nd - continue and the msls can guide themselves
1 Like
All my sources for the A-150 are suggested (except one not worth mentioning). My knowledge of the ships isn’t very extensive.
What do you mean?
The Yak-141 was added under the same exact rules Ho-229, Kikka, XP-50, Swift F7, VB 10-02 were added.
I can’t remember if G56 has its guns equipped IRL or not.
Either way, it was added under the same exact rules yet there were topics everywhere complaining just because it was a Soviet vehicle addition…
I’m all for criticizing Soviet vehicles, it’s something I enjoy doing.
Getting mad over a vehicle being added under long-standing rules unchanged since 2013 is… something else.
3 Likes
i didnt meant only sources for the A-150 but overall you got more sources in form of books, official/historical documents etc. for all kind of things (mainly these sweet sweet japanese props and jets), all i got is basicly google wich contains sometimes offical dokuments like Report O-17 wich talks about japanes shell fuzes wich i used to suggested a 46cm ordinary Typ 0 HE shell with time fuze as substitute for yamatos beehive shell.
1 Like
I think whats interesting is that its a completely different style of tank to what Japan has currently. Not to mention potentially decent armor same weak spots sure but some actual armor compared to Type 90 or TKX P (assuming it stays 11.7). And will be just as fast as a Type 90 could be a great first spawn or back up for that line up.
Also the first ERA equipped tank for Japan.
4 Likes
I’d recon some of them are about a certain UK technology demonstrater we shall not name not being eligible (or was it “no plans?”)
Private venture technology demonstrators that weren’t even a prototype for something would fall under the “No privately owned aircraft.” rule let alone the no weapons of many of them.
Not just the one you’re hinting at.
1 Like
Didn’t realise there were more examples (I’m guessing maybe the Su-47 aswell?)
(I wish we had the Su-47…)
what if u lose lock mid way n re lock after a few seconds ?.
just uh… give it and the MiG 1.44 the yak-141 treatment and add them clearly.
I have no idea. But i guess that in game, due the DL, it will reaquire it. If you lose in terminal, just like on planes, it is cooked unless target does not change path.
I think it depends. The Stingray for the US assuming the stats from the devblogs is one of the initial demosntrators. This was a private venture never intended for the US, only for export. Only later would different Stingray versions like the Stingray AGS or Stingray II be offered to the US.
So going from that I think other demonstrators could also be added to other nations, so long as they aren’t designed for or directly adopted by another nation entirely.
so boys, what we got today?
nothing?
Does anyone know if there is any new top-tier russian tank coming in this update?
nope, we do not know that
nobody does
You know how it is, weekend sometimes causes severe headaches. This must be one of these times.