Yeah. They’ll do whatever they want, but it would be a lot cleaner.
Spoiler
Though Ukrainian Challenger 2s would perhaps finally get bug fixes if added to the soviet TT :P
1 Like
Honestly at this point M-55S is in my opinion similiar to something like that happening
Just the first tank with a welded turret out of the T90 family and also the reason why the 1000 hp engine was adopted into the family too i believe, completely barely unique though xD
Sure, its “barely unique” if you want to compare it to the Russian TT T90A, but the thing is the Indian T90 was first, by like 3-5 years or so pending how you want to claim it for adoption, by design, a decade nearly?
also, Vickers mk1/Vijayanta is also a massively indian influenced design too, just sayin’ and were effectively a completely different tank to the initial designs being developed.
I do agree but also at the same time the M-55S is more interesting to me than another T80.
On a similar note its also incredibly annoying that they are adding the BMD-4M2 which as far as i can tell is the same as the premium one but with a CITV and not any of the other BMD series, or BTRs for that matter. There is also a whole bunch of ATGM vehicles.
You jest but i can see them doing exactly that…
T-64AM, T-64BM (Soviet version), T-55M5, T-55M6, etc etc
Plus the millions of actually interesting Soviet and Russian T-72 and T-80 variants are all examples of great actual Russian vehicles gaijin could add instead of going for the most barely Russian vehicle.
Would love to see T-72B1MS added to Russian tech tree
As for M-55S there are a couple of pretty interesting vehicles that would fill the gap
(Very similiar to M-55S upgrade)
Also T-55M6 which isnt on the forums yet but will soon to come courtesy of @Savage_Virus_R6 who suggests great unique eastern vehicle variants.
Really do want to see T-64AM though, pretty big backbone of the soviet ground forces in the 80s
3 Likes
I’m looking forward to the M-55S, nice filler for the 9.0 9.7 bracket, even comes with a LWR.
As long as we get fixes. Im all for it
Personally don’t really notice this? They are present don’t get me wrong, but I never really feel like I die to them alot? (For context I play a lot of the CVRT Scimitar, Striker, & Olifant Mk.1A at 8.3). Though that might be me being more of a passive player, thus see, engage, kill and/or die too, with much more reaction time.
I don’t see the T-55M6 being added anytime soon, as the “bustle-mounted autoloader” was, in fact, not mounted iirc
I got about 3 T-62s and 2 more T-55s pending.
1 Like
If it was paper and works on it would’ve never started, we would not have accepted the Suggestion, let alone pass it.
2 Likes
Ong bro, my opinion is that if it didn’t have an atleast large size or semifunctional mock-up, it shouldnt work. (In addition to things like electronics and systems already have been tested).
The whole adding things to the game because one engine or one gun was made and someone drew something isn’t really premise to add stuff
2 Likes
Don’t think it is under Gaijins own rules.
It’s a good read though.
1 Like
it’s a slippery slope man
Did it have any part unique to it built?
Because that’s the rules for suggestions, if a part was built that was meant for it existed(and was not used on anything else), it’s a valid suggestion.
2 Likes
Here’s hoping to the Avro Vulcan with 12x Aim-54s as the Vulcan was in operational service, even if it never got a single one of the upgrades needed for that loadout :P
2 Likes
Engines were made
Were the engines unique to that aircraft or just standard engines planned for that aircraft?
1 Like
