Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

Well we already sees Gaijin just use modelling without any change in WTM, so Gneisenau would be with old modelling with 1942 version of 283 mm.
Especially proposed 380 mm version needs extensive change in bow, don’t think Gaijin will do such hard work while working with two more ship(Vanguard is also in WTM, and having modelling problem)

1 Like

Because of turtleback armor better to use in short-medium range so I prefer 283’s where penetration is no problem.

nope SLM is far to long range and the boxer isnt real

Yeah yeah, rub salt in the wound 🥲
I want sth with more then 10km whose only job will be to intercept munition

not really got any hope for this dev blog since the last two have been ground and the last one was an SPAA and the thing I want is a british SPAA so not really expecting much today, maybe a dev blog on multi vic systems?

I mean eh? the UK is in the exact same boat

Well i had that 20km thing didnt you?
More likely at least. If we ignlre that russia needs tp keep the best stuff

the SA one that is 20km is a multi vic system, Skysabre the launcher can work by itself but is 25km and is probably to much for gaijin, not to mention since it doesnt have a radar it would need the ability to use LOAL

1 Like

Let’s see what this day will bring us
D03WNIKF0rDmRRRW1bBP3MQOhNUJb3MZc62Pr5cu3lpo8tvhJHLPAw-HrpDr3ZEpt6_x2zB9w3JzcQ8vEk3IUwqV

1 Like

Me too, especially German 380 mm would be not super good in penetration, which would be just little better than British 381 mm)

2 Likes

wdym? Sky sabre can do DL just fine by itself. DL is provided by the mast with a dome on the launcher, not the radar.


E/O can provide all the needed data, tho you are limited in amout of targets you can DL the missiels at.

2 Likes

oh I assumed it would need a radar for the missiles to lock on before the launch, fair enough then

tbf I fully expect gaijin to limit it to one missile at a time to its the same as SACLOS sams

I would not be surprised. Especially considering that proving the tracker multi-track will be quite a challange, that is untill they release the official designation of the E/O.

1 Like

I am curious if we will get the skysabre before multi vic launchers as it can act as a single unit just not as effective

impossible, you are just too hurry, most of the vehicles are able to operate as single unit.
and skysabre has a problem, not sure it can operate without radar, it has DL, but no fire control radar, it still needs something to provide fire control information.
usually things like BUK has its own fire control radar to operate

EX has better maneuverability than CX?

It has a E/O (the smaller mast)
image

1 Like

what’s E/O?

Electro optical sensor. Basically a sight