Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

Mark of distinction for vehicles with Talisman pretty please? :D
Yk you want it gaijin. More people will buy talimans.

image

image

bg_f8f8f8-flat_750x_075_f-pad_750x1000_f8f8f8-removebg-preview

8 Likes

Yeah, I somehow forgot about that.

We were talking about the version with HN-6 manpads though, which are so bad that you might as well not take them into battle.

With the 17km missiles? definitely 12.0.

With HN-6? 10.3. This version is legit a gun only SPAA. It’s range is just pretty hard limited against aware targets.

Then it probably wont get ahead at 10.3. At least im fairly certain its been denied for a few others at and around that BR.

But still sounds like a pretty decent addition for 10.3 when compared to direct equivalents like Stormer AD and LAV-AD

Year after my bug reports. Nothing changed. Sadly

1 Like

Without AHEAD it will just be than of both. worse chassis and no usable missiles for a ever so slightly better gun.

AHEAD would make it a sidegrade, but might make it a bit too strong up close.

We already need ahead correction to real amount of shrapnel and it’s spread.

Its still fully combat capable like the Rafale B / EuroMogger T.3 (those both keep their cannons tho)

image

1 Like

hey Magazine are you aware of any plans to add a ww2 or cold war jeep to the game at any point in the future?

get-out-of-here-throw

skyranger would be the same so yeah.

And i mean what am i supposed to say when some of the reliable leakers say its the manpad version?

1 Like

If there is South Dakota, it will be super. I have been waiting for this battleship from the US for a long time

A bit of beauty

Spoiler




2 Likes

they have caps over the cannon on the EF
on this picture you can see it better bc the cap has a different color than the paintjob


also the top right picture in your message shows the EF from the wrong side

At least that would still get stingers no? Which aren’t good but at least usable.

Oh yeah I’m not pissed at you, just pissed at the thought of receiving a garbage slop 10.X filler SPAA (yes, anything with HN-6 missiles classifies as that) when we need more and better SPAA at top tier.

This vehicle no from latest leak

499523283_2179413375853205_5550047523472431342_n

4 Likes

Stingers or Mistrals, yes. But there’s also options for 9 Anti-Drone missiles (SADM, Small-Anti-Drone-Missile) and anti-munition missiles (SkyKnight), but AFAIK no one has bought those versions yet.

1 Like

anyone say this?

Ok I’ve just been thinking and it’s time for a poll.

In order for South African ground tree to have rank V which of the following would you like to see moved up in my concept tree ?

  • Ratel 20
  • Ratel 90
  • G6
  • Eland 90
  • All
0 voters

image

1 Like

Its from the 2025 decal.

Ok…I have not been on the forums in a while. I see it looks like a ground launched IRIS-T is coming, anyone think at the Christmas update we will see these class of IR missiles on the 14.0 we have???