LOAL would take even less skill.
That is a strawman.
the argument is FnF takes skill not a straw man it falls under FnF or should I say using AGM65 or Hammers also take “skill”
Yes but on some maps you’ll literally be able to get in close enough because of terrain having never shown yourself and not show yourself, just launch, that actually needs enemy CAP to defeat.
At least with LOBL FnF the SPAA has a chance to fire on you, which mind you if coming from an unexpected angle and done fast would still leave no chance for counterplay from the spaa.
oh yeah I know but saying FnF takes skill is just wrong
My argument was that there is some skill required to use LOBL weapons. You then twisted this to make it out that I was saying that it requires large amounts of skill to use them. You used a strawman.
The time waiting for dev blog is always the hardest. :c
It’s a boat anyway.
Another damn premium hornet… Why couldn’t the UK get either a canadian or australian TT hornet? it’s not much of a stretch.
1 Like
because there is so much skill in using LOBL I clicked 2 buttons oh no
The UK already has the Gripen, so there’s no need for it.
Another strawman.
not really a need for the Hornet either for germany so eh?
1 Like
I hope they dont dare.
Germany has no capable top tier CAS aircraft.
1 Like
Even if it’s the Bismarck?
Argueably the worst fox3 capable gripen (It never even carried the R-Darter), and don’t act like germany needed a hornet
1 Like
keep saying that if it makes you feel better doesnt change the fact every FnF weapon at top tier takes next to no skill
I dont play or care for naval.
A2A performance is irrelevant since we’re talking about CAS.