I mean it would explain why naval have separate rules to other trees
1 Like
Or maybe… Gaijin’s plan is to attract more players to Naval? To get that percentage larger?
I don’t think the ships alone are going to be enough but I think it’s ridiculous to call it a waste
6 Likes
Naval as a core concept MUST carry different rules, even its competition carry different concepts from their correlative games.
1 Like
*Waste of money
Gaijin has explicitly stated before that they cut things they seem as a waste of money like bomber cockpits
You are more than welcome too. I can only present the facts as they are.
Its not uncommon for an update to have a focus. Some may be a new tree launch, others an Air focused update, some Ground and some Naval. All of have had a time in the cycle before and it wont be the last time.
18 Likes
Hence why I’m asking about the team leaders, if they do then they could be the ones that set’s the rules ect
i still want to complain to the naval developers.
If the Bismarck gets added this patch, not having done the devblog today out of all days should be punished
1 Like
you remember Command & Conquer: Generals?
you r that old? lol good GOLDEN old days
we met the heli in that era lol
1 Like
Hey, maybe this update brings some solutions to these concerns!
They can’t possibly add these ships 0.7-1.0 BRs away from WW1 Dreadnoughts… so there must be some decompression planned.
Hopefully they will update the economy so that it doesn’t take 6 hours of gameplay to grind a single ship with Premium Account and Premium/Talisman ships xD.
And, most ideally; they may stop throwing BBs into 3 cap maps where 1 single stupid Torpedo Boat can cap in 20 seconds and end the match before any BB has time to do anything at all.
Also, they should at least give us to use Realistic Aiming in Arcade Battles, just like it was the case before, as an alternative to the new mess of a system which barely works as it’s suppossed to.
1 Like
God i hope so. the prospect of playing a kommuna and then a tu-2 into a yamato or iowa is grim to say the least.
Those who are complaining about development without a honest reason have you tried to do your own development every update adds something new thats what an update is they have had these updates planned not everything will come as planned maybe now naval was ready vs that new tank/aircraft you wanted maybe a new game mode over fixing an old map you don’t know what is planned until they tell you and when they do you get upset cause it isn’t what you wanted
God loves American boats
Why not? It’s clear that the naval team is really small (assuming it is more than the intern and stray cat he found). And the naval content for most updates tends to be one new ship and a coupe of copy-pastes with little to no gameplay changes. And since Gaijin outsources most of their models nowadays, its not surprising at all that they’d save up a new tier of ships for a single big update the way they’ve done air or ground.
2 Likes
And that could be why Russia been getting British ships lately, at least now we have a finger to point at someone lol
WT players complaining about an update? Insanity!
It always blows my mind that so many players think the game revolves around them. I almost never get disappointed by a new vehicle even if I don’t plan to play it, because I know someone out there has been waiting for it to come.
2 Likes
Stop it : (
Its very true. Behind every vehicle, there is always someone who has been waiting for it for a long time and happy to see it :)
9 Likes
First of all, i’m not complaining about an update.
Secondly, i’m adressing a genuine concern if they really have locked, specialized teams behind certain areas of the game because, if you carefully follow the dripfeed, the amount of content between the different areas of the game doesn’t quite add up in such consistency to achieve that conclusion at all.
Last, i’m glad that naval players got some love, but i’m not overlooking that they’ve been consistently asking for some refurbishment on their core gameplay, and the new content might overshadow their requests.
1 Like
I imagine statistically, probably like <0.1% of the playerbase would ever actually own Spyder, but since the leak, every ISR vehicle discussion thread has that tiny % bouncing in anticipation lmao.
1 Like
No matter how good or needed the SPAA additions are, they are still vehicles that most casual people don’t know much about irl, with very little intense gameplay that will mostly just sit back from the action not doing much.
So yeah, good luck hyping that up for the casual or even new players. What sounds cooler in an ad that random people (that haven’t played WT before) see on youtube for example:
“In the latest update we have added a whole bunch of new vehicles from the T-72B3A to the F-2A to iconic ww2 battleships like the Yamato, Iowa and Bismarck.”
or
“In the latest update we have added a whole bunch of new vehicles from the T-72B3A to the F-2A to SAM systems like the IRIS-T SLM, Spyder AiO and CS/SA5.”
we both know which names will ring a bell to more people and thus attract more potential people.
1 Like