what’s the context behind this one?
Yippee! I’m sure Gaijin won’t do anything to ruin that.
1 Like
“clear Marketing lie” is insane, that could be used as an excuse for litterally anything at all.
It was used
its funny cus they take russian stuff at what ever the devs say it is
1 Like
Stingergate moment
2 Likes
Ain’t it? I could literally point at any decent/good vehicle in the game and say ‘its perfomance its a clear marketing lie’ and if it’s up to the bug reporting managers, they could easily favor my opinion depending on their will.
Its something deeply flawed with their system, and have been deliberately erratic on addresing it.
2 Likes
reminds me of the challenger nerf to the back plate
only happen to non RU vehicle btw
1 Like
The aim120 doesn’t have a range exceeding 20nm!!! Clear Marketing lie!!!))))) - devs, probably. Terrible precedent to set, imo.
Brochure is gospel when it comes to those!
idk i only was able to see it fly 4 miles, so be safe its like 2.5 miles, and with some clouds, idk 400m
Thats what I mean, I thought the VBCI was bad, then there is the badger
Just roll out the ARMA badget at this stage, put a namer turret on it and call it the day
Well you have an uh, 5% chance to blow up one of your guns, have fun! Im pretty sure the crew can put it back under place for like 40 seconds
So a 95% chance nothing happens. Sounds like a good deal because after all, nothing ever happens.
@Smin1080p_WT will be ever get an Option on the War Thunder Bug Report site to sort reports via Labels?
Like you select
Accepted
And the site will display you only reports with the Accepted label ))))
1 Like
I would be fine with more Soviet interceptors or the F-15K or F-15SG personally
(But more of the century series would be nice to)
1 Like
The option exists only for staff at the moment. Its possible features like that may be considered for expansion in the future.
4 Likes
Holy cope Batman.
26 Likes