and Russian back up vehicles are not so good, you have to choose between T-90M and T-80U, both not so comfortable.
1 Like
but not in the place where you said it is
1 Like
because you strated with it and he fact checked your statement about winning 8 out of 10 matches in the T-80
1 Like
I’ll repeat once again in case you didn’t understand. Everything I’ve said is my personal opinion and observation, and it certainly doesn’t insult anyone around me. Apparently, I’m not the one throwing sarcasm your way, as you allow yourself to do.
So you “personally feel” you won 8/10 matches but only actually win 5-6/10?
Did you frame generate those wins?
4 Likes
well and he corrected you in the points you were wrong
that is how a conversation works and if you dont like ppl having different views from you, you shouldnt be on this forum
like what was your expectation?
that everyone just blindly agrees with you?
2 Likes
“Red Star Bad. White Star Good!”
1 Like
true
russain bias
1 Like
Victories, as I wrote earlier, come from USSR players taking aviation earlier and flying unpunished because there’s often nothing to counter it with. If the allies don’t have a Rafale, there’s practically nothing to strike ground vehicles with. I was talking about my personal games and the last times I played this equipment after a two-month break. Please don’t twist my words.
I’m not against people having opinions different from mine. I’m not upset about that. Initially, I was told that they couldn’t directly respond to my post due to forum restrictions, which is why this dialogue continued. You claim you’re right, and I respect your opinion. But it’s not up to you to decide where I should or shouldn’t be.
t80um2 has anti missile system, can eat 8 heli missiles
where’s the um2 in the image
1 Like
The performance is fine on a 11.0 jet that didn’t face constant Pantsir and ARHM aircraft.
Without that Brimstone is a Hellfire that has to be guided singularly by laser. It’s damage is not always a OHK and it forces the aircraft using them to fly low and towards the battlefield making them even more vulnerable to the really short range systems like Strela/Wiesel/Stinger and even 2S38s
Yes 18 is nice but the reality is you will be lucky to achieve 5 kills with that payload. In most games
2 Likes
lol
i mean if you want to buy and they are almost the same in price, t80um2 is better lol
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I’m still undecided on whether to buy the Gneisenau or not…
Has more information been leaked about it? Is there anything I missed? Do we know anything about the ammunition, reload rate, crew count, and BR? (I assume it’ll be 7.0)
The thing is, I don’t need to grind the German tech tree (it’s already up to date). I don’t need to farm SL either (though it’s always useful). I’d only buy it if it’s just as OP, or even better, than the Scharnhorst.
I assume it should be OP like the Scharnhorst, with the difference being greater firepower at the cost of a lower reload rate.
Which of these two configurations do you think will be more dominant? Is it worth buying?
bugged turtleback armor, matches forces the bug due to close range… close range makes the armor better… break the spirits of other nations players that don’t want to play meta.
no this isn’t satrical, if gaijin doesn’t really care enough to do it properly, get the moffet of the top tier (def wait until you see dev server before buying) don’t know if there is actual huge changes (doubt it)
I suppose battleship late WW2 - early cold war battle rating 7.7 minimum or 8.0 maximum (naval battle)
MiG-29K (9-31) or MiG-29KR (9-41) for soviet/russia tech tree ?
?
It was closed because people were getting off topic and starting to insult each other
ty mate