Considering real world scenario; J/APG-2 is inferior to RBE2-AA.
All F-2 were able to use AAM-4. Hhowever only J/APG-2 enabled (specialized) Datalink guidance using J/ARG-1 transmitter - i.e. a F-2 with J/APG-1 would be able to use AAM-4 but only by guiding it via hard-lock.
IIRC, the F-2A’s flight performance is similar to that of the F-16C’s. Little bit more performance than an F-16A but all the extra weight means it loses an endurance fight
The extra weight is countered and then some by flight computer and other improvements. The only thing it can’t really overcome is the higher drag when it comes to top speed which the F-16C should be faster.
Given how an F-16A runs circles around an F-16C, even T/W isn’t a good indicator of anything
But as Fireraid mentioned, this is all in theory, at the end of the day, Gaijin can model it however they want
Fair, even if the difference is probably less bad outside the US where representations of other nations tech is more common and F-2 is the go-to aircraft to represent Japan as a nation.
At least here the F-2 was one of the big well-known aircraft for just the average kid. For me it’d be Eurofighter, Tornado, F-14, F-22, Rafale, MiG-29, Su-27 and F-2 as the modern aircraft I’d know before actually developing more of an interest.
Seeing the F-16 for the first time my initial thought was it might be an upgraded F-2, because the common US aircraft was either F-15 or F-22, so I connected the appearance more to the Japanese plane.
Anyway, boy I sure do hope the F-2 and Richelieu will be worth the wait and aren’t going to be complete letdowns that kill my hype to play the game. Surely Gaijin wouldn’t do that, right?
dont remember the exact date, but Japan heavily rushed the development of the F-2 in order to beat the US to have the first flying AESA radar, but that resulted in a comical amount of problems for the F-2