I mean you can hope that Gaijin adds actually good vehicles to a sub tree.
I think it would entirely depend on which refit, reskinned Scharnhorst would sell well because it would be a cheat sheet into German top tier and would necessitate the addition of the Bismarck (good luck everybody else).
15" Gneisenau would have an unplayably poor reload rate but knowing Gaijin and German naval, they will just magic in a nicer figure that they like more.
They changed the Marut BR from 7.7 to 9.0, yes 9.0 with no counters or missle, great well done gaijin
3 Likes
How do you know it’s for the F-2? Shimadzu made a lot of HMDs
There are plenty of 9.0s and 9.3s without either missiles or countermeasures
6 Likes
except this one is just a worse hunter
Stalingrad would be worse than Kron I think but the USSR should’ve received Stalingrad instead of taking the Italian ship Guilio Cesare as there were only 2. As for the R class the UK should’ve gotten it first, with 2 added like the Bayerns which leaves the QE’s as the modernised interwar ones which could compete against some of the early 16" ships etc.
1 Like
Literally everything has missiles at that tier and yes it will face 10.0 too, it’s will just be dead at that BR
1 Like
VN-1C would be neat, BTR-3E1 and BTR-3RK would be neat as well, Commando Stingray, Sea Tiger AAPC, T-84 Oplot-T. Plenty of neat options, plus with the Stingray and VN-1 they could be added to two trees at once. Plenty of unique options that we can only hope they pick.
3 Likes
Lots they take liberties with moving and firing vehicles and it’s one of the better gameplay decisions.
It is British…
what did you expect? A Hunter equivalent being 1.3 BR lower for absolutely no reason?
4 Likes
I had a vague hope that it would be 8.7 given the Hunter F.1 seems to still have a legacy br at 9.0 even after the sabres and migs were shifted down.
1 Like
Indian atcually
We almost had the opportunity to run the Marut with the V tank but now we can’t
I to was hoping it would be 8.7, just because it seems a little better than the Hunter F.1, and if it was moved there, the Hunter would go there too.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
It seems to be a touch faster but have a touch worse sustained, for all intents and purposes the same thing. But I don’t think the F.1 should be at 9.0 particularly post-sabre and Mig move-down (ironic that they moved some of the best vehicles br for br down whilst leaving everything British and French and Swedish several of which were a bit underpowered at their br’s).
So yeah the hope was they’d introduce it at 8.7 and then the F.1 would be shifted down to 8.7 also. Having it at 9.0 pretty much doesn’t make it worth it, you’re not too far from the Ariete and a CL-13B will just rock your world regardless of your speed advantage you can’t do much with that anyway.
It is what it is but this makes it not worth grinding for me personally.
1 Like
- Because i know shimadzu made an HMD for the F-2 from multiple first and secondary sources.
- Because the other HMDs shimadzu made do all have known purposes, with each design being able to easily be tracked down except this one.
- On the table next to it is their other HMD they worked on for the F-15J(M) (the JHMCS derived one.), with the image being from a display at Japan Airpower Exhibition 2004.
5 Likes
It’s in the British tree…So it’s treated like it’s British