Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

[maxidaxy_ネコ]

Or, now get ready for this. Gaijin wouldn’t half ass everything that isn’t either USA or Russian

[Raiden_Black]

a 2.33

Wednesday

[Deathmisser]

Most models in game are either ones that are dated back to the original game and out sourced.
As I say we know this info so yeah

[Yontzee]

@maxidaxy ネコ

And the Thai sub-tree you mentioned is nothing but copy-paste slob. Would have rather seen the F-2A instead

You might not like it but I want to see it. Besides, the Ground and Air developing teams work independently of one another. F-2A coming vice Thai-ground has no connection.

Edit: Besides, who’s to say that you can’t get both more indigenous Japanese vehicles and Thai vehicles.

[Raiden_Black]

@maxidaxy ネコ

Thai sub-tree you mentioned is nothing but copy-paste slob.

Yea,
But,
In contrast, the Ground subtree ones’d be unique if you compare to current existing WT vehicles.

[Deathmisser]

I want to see Thai ground too, both C&P or not I want to make pure line ups which how can I do that without a tank because someone else called it C&P lol

[Deathmisser]

Btw

Indian T-90 in Britain
Mig’s in Italy
T-80 and MI in China

(about my previous comments about the Thai VT-4 going to Japan)

[Raiden_Black]

Anyways
the wednesday teaser was just /s stuff

Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

But has to be teaser before that, tho ( in my opinion, what it should be: continuous devblog every day, teaser by this week’s end, dev stream by next week’s Thursday, dev server by next week’s Friday ~ this gives the devblogs more importance and engagement/discussion than get spoiled by the early dev stream within the 1st week [which makes the devblogs lose most of the interest ] )

[General_Efin_Lee]

From currently grinding through Japan ground, i dont care if we get copy and paste M60’s and T-72"s, japan needs something in order to have actual usable lineups since those stop existing after 6.7

[Raiden_Black]

I’d take other ASEAN for JP as well.

[Pvt_Wade]

@Toxin

40km range would be juicy

Pantsir SM will have to be added in retaliation

[Raiden_Black]

[Zulizia]

I hope they do both! CCV, O-I (?), variations of existing vehicles (Type 16s, Type 89 (P), STB/A, etc.) along with the Thai subtree bolstering and bringing more playstyle to Mid-High tier Japan.

[Zulizia]

7.7 lineup is great, as is the 9.0-9.7 BR range. 11.3 recently got cucked, but still good. 11.7 is great, as is 12.0. Everything else has gaps or sucks.

[General_Efin_Lee]

We likely wont ever see the O-I since theres not much proof that it actually existed as a full vehicle outside of blueprints, questionable testimoney, and a track link that doesnt go to anything else

[MAUSWAFFE]

@maxidaxy ネコ

And the Thai sub-tree you mentioned is nothing but copy-paste slob.

To be fair that’s on Gaijin, not an issue with Thai vehicles. They could’ve added more unique aircraft and modelled some of those we did get right, but didn’t.

[Zulizia]

Yeah, left the (?) in case I missed some new developments. Hope that something comes up eventually surrounding it, as the only Heavy tanks in Japan is a worse Tiger (80GJN) and a 1.3 premium.

[General_Efin_Lee]

At 7.7 Japan only has the Type 87 RCV (P). Theres no other 7.7 vehicles and youl be forced to bring stuff like the M47 and Type 99 up which does not make for a sound lineup

[Rowiek]

We still need more STA, STB, SPRG, Chi-Ha kai variants.

Like this: List of Previously Suggested Ideas - Japanese Ground Forces (Please Check Before Creating A New Suggestion!) - Japan - War Thunder - Official Forum

[Rowiek]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.