I must admit Roma is… calling me…
However, for consideration, I would still need;
1- GOOD Rank VI Premium BB.
2- Future-proof potential additional content (at least one more ship equal or better than Roma).
3- I still need to check how it will turn out on the Dev Server; primarily in terms of armor, shell quality and rate of fire.
But… look at this…
You can have a mega huge thousand post battle with Columbus anytime xdd
Yeah, I’m tempted to grind a second naval tree, but not sure if I can be bothered.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I want a 4th for sure, hahah.
I am between Italy and U.K for now, it will all boil down to whichever nation gets a better Rank VI Premium, mostly.
After all, I’ll spend at least 2 months playing that ship exclusively, so I need to make sure it’s a good and fun one- and, ideally, one good enough to stay at the endgame lineup.
Well if we are going by historical terms not the greatest dispersion and a longer reload then Yamatos mains. But its up to gaijin of course
Yeah, that is a smart move.
Though I do recommend Belfast for the earlier BRs if you wanted a cruiser premium. She has some annoying vulnerabilities but is otherwise a really decent ship.
But yeah… We’ll have to wait and see if/what we get for a rank VI premium for either nation
I was tempted to grind France or Italy the old fashion way, but I dont know if I have enough interest in any of the ships to do that. I quite like just being able to play the game
4 Days gajin announced devblog battleship rank VII
I suppose today might be devblog aircraft
Still got Iowa, Yamato and Bismark left to go first
And then hopefully a new naval map (or 3)
What!? Interesting… rate of fire is one of the hard main factors for me; I am not willing to play anything >30 seconds, hahah. I had enough with the American BBs. It’s too painful. That’s why I am not so interested on the Rodneys, because of their 36 second expert reloads.
That’s also why I am leaning towards Bismarck, if her reload is 24-26 seconds as it should be the case.
Its a shame they’ve so far denied Rodneys 30 second reload
and do wonder if they are going to give the new premiums coming this update their 60-70 second reloads
Take it with a grain of salt but it has around a RoF of 1.3 or 45 secs
Holy Jesus, if they implement it like that, it will be an absolute no for me hahah.
After American BBs, I vowed… never again!
Then my 4th tree, if I decide to go for it and a Rank VI Premium KGV is implemented, will be U.K.
Eh there at least would be some more in the future(ASM or standoff CAS capable boldened)
Top tier: F/A-18C(L), F-14D VS MiG-29K, Yak-141(L), Su-32FN, J-15/15T, Rafale M, SHAR FRS.51
High tier/early ARH: F-14A/B, F/A-18A, F/A-18C(E), AV-8B+, SHAR FA.2, VS Yak-141, Su-33(+ AV-8B+(ITA))
However lower tiers probably needs dedicated MM such as US vs Britain+France+Soviets
Late cold war: F-4J/S, A-7K, VS FG.1, SHAR FRS.1/FRS.1(E), HRR GR.5, HRR GR.7, HRR GR.9, Jaguar M, Super Etendard, Su-25UTG
IR missiles: AV-8A/B NA/C/S, A-7D/E, F8U, F-8E VS F-8E(FN), HRR GR.1, HRR GR.3
Sea Harrier FA2 is the more capable of the 2. (better engine, better radar, more CMs, better AAMs)
But yeah, might be enough then for a naval vs naval gamemode
Probably it has to be US vs everyone else at lower tier, but at least given how primitive BVR is at the time its in dogfighting distance and teamkills are not very likely to happen, and at higher tiers there are IFF for each other anyways to know who you are locking on
I was rewatching the previous trailers for updates in anticipation for one today
Air Superiority has gone AWOL for some reason?
Where’d it go?
