Normally its teaser than blog after if on the same day. If memory serves me right
Guys, please use PMs or more relevant topics for matters that are not related to the next major.
I’m fine with no F-2 in the teaser under the special condition that the end has a long, drawn out scene of an ASM-2/3 destroying a battleship.
Pretty sure that will get enough people interested in whatever just did that much damage and with that interested in the F-2
3 Likes
DOA, eh I doubt it, the T-72B3 is still a great vehicle even without the UBH modification, this just adds more flavor to the vehicle.
the swiss premium f18 is pure speculation, right?
It’s a fairly reliable leak, but as always a leak doesn’t fully guarantee that it’s in the update.
No, the list is legit
1 Like
Knowing how Gaijin has currently modelled anti-ship weapons it’s just going to get a “Hit” before you get shot down by AA from miles away
1 Like
I’m sure they can work their teaser magic to hit an ammo rack
(Or fix them, but we’re trying to stay realistic here)
1 Like
The fact they even hit at all is a miracle (unless its a carrier, they still miss those somehow)
2 Likes
Thats understable, however hostility isnt going to yield a different answer or outcome im afaid. Thats the wrong approach.
2 Likes
Most of my ASM’s miss the carriers too
4 Likes
I’ve asked and nudged for changes and fixes for years.
As have many many others. Inclduing a Senior GM
Heck, even in the last 2x BR changes we’ve had this year. Sim has been an after thought in only one of them and the other didnt get a single Sim change.
I am very concerned by the devs attitude towards Sim these days. It has such potential, but just feels like the Devs are trying to kill it. Probably to force players over to Aces of Thunder which will suck, because of the limited pool of aircraft and era
Its clear that “being calm” isnt working
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/vC5kAI8rX3CY
I did an report for the F-4F ICE 10 months ago,got not a bug because those Indikators are only for the 3rd person displays, but not Cockpits
1 Like
Anyway, are there plans to increse the scale of air maps in the future?
Nope; big blogs of main update highlights tend to come during streams; teasers tend to come the night before this. But I can’t remember if they come on days where blogs have already been released.
Once again, this is understandable but does not however justify coming at a subject that way or approaching questions aimed at staff like that. It will not lead to anything constructive or meaningful when you come in guns blazing making demands when the only possible answers at a given moment in time have been provided.
Let me be very clear that hostility towards staff (not even just me) wont work in any regard.
3 Likes
Almost only Naval and Map devblogs. Thats not interesting for most players.
What we really need to know is about new ground units, expecially the new SPAAs and Missiles. All these BBs are hardly played, Naval is a niche game mode.
Perhaps,
But the Falklands map should have been an Air Sim map first and marketed that way, with it being adapted for Air RB and other gamemodes (heck could get a few decent ground and naval maps out of it too with a little effort)
The fact that you cant even confirm for certain that its even going to be added to Air Sim is just a giant concern. Let alone all the other game breaking issues Sim and its playerbase is forced to deal with constantly (and many have been reported many many times over the years)
Suffice to say, I have some dev-server threads to write
(This is after all the last time Sim got an update: [Development] New locations: “Arctic” and “Rocky Canyon” - News - War Thunder)
4 Likes