Massive doubts to that better mobility. Wheeled chassis will likely just make it worse mobility wise. The PGZ09 and 04A are already quite mobile.
It would be 10.0 at best with HN-6, 10.7 if Gaijin wants to add it borderline doa. China really isn’t in need for spaa at that BR range. Hell they barely have lineups at these BR to pair it with.
doubt it, also not much of a point now as it would have just been a gap filler till the EFT came and since the EFT is already here not much of a reason for it
Badger is exciting shame they only show it killing a T-44…and not a tank or vehicle it will actually face i worry for the letality of the 30mm autocannon 🫠
Never seen them get anywhere close. I just see Su25s flying over and then about half a tonne (literally) of rounds are on me. IDK how my little 4 wheeler takes that.
They’ve nerfed or nuked other ships like all the British 15” should be 25 seconds and are at 32, Rodney should be 30 and is at 38 after lots of fighting for it. US standards are a whole other story too being at 40 when they should be at 32-35.
It wouldn’t hurt a Scharnhorst class still one of the tankiest ships in game to have a historical reload and sure as hell it should be at worst equal to a US standard.
But I do agree they’ll probably say LOL no and reject it. The difference here is that as battleships are essentially auto loaded there is a hard limit to how fast it can be done. For the lightweight mounts on Gneisenau that’s 70 seconds average being closer to 90
The HN-6 (with no proxy fuze) already is bad and extremely inconsistent when it comes to shooting down aircraft. I don’t see how anyone can even think about using these things to intercept ordenance that is even smaller than aircraft.
You not going to have the F-2 straight off the bat wait you turn, just because you want something doesn’t mean the whole update cycle should change only for you