Between “add a Yamato alongside every other nation getting an end-of-line BB” or “add a Yamato while some nations get absolutely nothing”, the former is the better option.
Which is likely exactly why we’re seeing this, considering the devs would probably much prefer to spread the hype over three or four patches a couple ships at a time, but they didn’t.
oh no dont get me wrong im happy that they did add an end of the line ship for everyone just sad they kinda went with one of the worst options for the UK, I wouldnt be surprised if a late war KGV is actually better then vanguard
Well it’s still a waste of development time from the “Naval team” for as long as the core gameplay has been ruined by the Arcade aiming changes introduced in the Hornet’s Sting update. Doesn’t matter what new ships are added if the gameplay just isn’t fun anymore. At least, even with all Naval’s problems, it could still be fun firing at other players and getting kills on them with the old aiming system which made it worth playing. Now it’s just awful.
I didnt say dont play things that interest you/other way, I said that pushing a narrative of a lack of vehicles by cutting out 80% of the game isnt exactly accurate.
assuming gaijin models this and they dont just treat them like Hoods 15inch shells, and honestly as cool as vanguard as the last battleship is lion should be what we are getting since the soviets are getting a none nerfed Soyuz
Yeah, im not sure on specifics, so wont comment, btu I know she should be reasonably well protected, well at least the normal weakspots will be.
Im just hoping that they do her FCS justice and give her an edge in that regard.
I reckon it will be a Revenge-Class. Only reason I can think of as to why we’ve still yet to get one C&Ped over. Either that or Nelson. Id be annoyed if KGV was at least initially locked behind a paywall, especially if it was a late war fit ]