if we get both versions of the Comanche, then its likely the one thats premium doesnt get the wing pylons to sit at a lower BR
Makes no difference really with a WW2 rangefinder. Yes ours would be laser accurate, but with dispersion anyway, its not that deep.
You will be relying on the part where noone can get your magazines, that is your only strength. Basically you will die a death of 1000 cuts from ships reloading faster than you, rather than from one big bang.
The KOR-2 was also launched by the Maxim Gorki, and the Kirov.
Seems its not modeled as of yet, as its missing from both these vessels.
Suggestion Plug
1 Like
yeah, not meaning it can’t. but SM6 is just a part time ballistic missile interceptor, it’s main target is still planes.
I agree it does seem like britain is getting the short straw this update, but britain still is one of the most fun nations to play all around which is why i main it myself, i just dont like seeing fellow british mains complain when we already have a lot more stuff than other countries
1 Like
Gajin screwed up there either way already
Tbh my issue with it is the fact there is still a british battleship in the russian tree because they apparently needed it, and now they are getting 2 unfinished ships in the same update
1 Like
I agree a lot in naval we are pretty okay and some real shining stars in there (Hood my beloved).
We have a good tree all around and no tier is completely unplayable (rank IV comes close but southhampton and liverpool come in clutch), but this is genuinely like when they added Orion when Scharnhorst was at its peak.
It’s like yeah, its a good ship to add and I love to see it but… priorities???
Lion would be a much better addition here, as pen would be similar, more guns, but you’d have armour that would stand up as well as good module layout.
2 Likes
Another boat blog
2 Likes
More today?
I look at it from a top tier prespective up until recently the UK had the second least amount of 7.0s for naval only being beaten out by france, for ground they could have easily fixed both italy and the UK with CAMM instead both are being screwed over with nothing
I thinkis valid to complain when you have the worst SALCOS SAM at top tier and have had it for well over 2 years probably 3 and your one of the few nations not getting an improvement
then for naval our big end of the line ship is going to be one of the worst added this update, which could have been fixed if gaijin give the UK the same treatment of the soviets and got an incomplete ship (the lion will actually have historical stats for her 16inch guns as they are already in game Soyuz will probably get made up stats or gaijin will take the best estimate like the krons since the soviet 16inch guns arent in game)
1 Like
I don’t like the prices; I would much rather have a low-tier option of just a premium vehicle, nothing else, for about half off.
its just to heavy of a steep price for even me to consider purchasing
im just wondering what premium america could get for battleship, most of the iowa class had base model and late model, and the only ones that wasn’t upgraded was ships never fully built… i hope they use one of the never fully built so it wont be SOL for late model upgrades (that might even make ships have dynamic br’s)
also, really hope to see montana class battleships even if it wasn’t laid down… WoW with its health base system is just not it
With many ships, can the next version expect sea battles to become popular?
probably not unless they decompress
Initially but then numbers will dwindle again provided gaijin makes no big changes to naval maps and modes.
If they change the naval mode to be more interesting they have a chance
Doubt it. You gonna have needed to play naval already. People not gonna swamp towards it cause of new top tier ships
heavy decompression needs to happen, more ships to flush out the middle tier that doesn’t exist, and more game mechanics for gameplay that “top tier ships” have (not talking about missile boats)
i think some Spike missiles have a range more than that
nlos version
1 Like