BTR-82A, crazy that they didnt add a stabilised 30MM BTR
BTR-90 + BTR-90 Berezhok <3
Hopefully, as we would get a more diverse and expansive Top Tier for Japan.
“BM-Oplot T” at the very least, with BTR-4s following and I think Chinese VT-4s too.
Let’s just see how much Gaijin fucks up the “Oplot”s armour because its Ukrainian
it doesn’t change my narrative, u can also use the CS/SA5 as an autocannon IFV with that big f off 30mm
And then model on spaa and flyable model will be different
Because FB-10 thinner than FB-10A
and both of examples, are also filling of sub tree
exactly what I said, the CS/SA5 would be a filler, so you still haven’t gone away with my narrative
here’s another example, and the HQ17 isnt even that much better other than the biggest improvement of thermals and radar range.
Yes, but when have they cared. Su27SKs never carried wing tip pylons, never used R27ER. Also 2S6 never was able to fire 9M311M as well, so not that difficult to just ‘make up’.
It should have been, IDK why Gaijin bothered even. Should have been HQ17A.
they do have a big difference, in gaijin’s mind, before players complained, and they realize their mindless after complaining
but instead of fixing it, they make it lower br
101% going to happen because its Ukrainian, and because its for the Japanese TT.
I’m not going to say that i’m going to put my money on it, but i’m going to put my money on it.
Can you
do this
Then Gaijin wouldn’t have presented two pictures in “sneak peek” as “…advanced SAM vehicles”.
Shhh, this is an open secret we do not talk about, ignore all those nuke games from ZA-35s… xD
I won’t use the word “certain”, modelling error can happen, and it is possible the 625/E has been modelled before hand, with the modeller reusing the 625 hull for the CS/SA5
Better radar counts for sth as well.
Not to mention mobility etc
That’s a fair point but it could also mean what @WreckingAres283 said earlier, HN-6 stock, FB-10 unlockable, which will be cancer af.
That matters little cause all u can use it for is the gun, and no point to make the radar insane for the gun. Kinda pointless in this sense.
Mobility wise 04A isn’t bad anyways, it’s also tracked.
Reminds me of the hungsrian leo with the wrong mg.
Italian freccia missing commander camera.
Germany wrong aircraft number.
And so on
Still plays into it. And does raise br.
Being aware of the aircraft and flying armaments does a lot. Might have tws? Not sure
Or the Belgium Gladiator with the wrong guns.
