Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

It has 30mm gun, better than the Antelope by a mile.

1 Like

I’ve just woken up and see a SA vehicle so it’s devblog time baby

11 Likes

But the FB 10 is in the game. It’s in files, pretty stupid to not use it when making a vehicle no? Also just as a reminder, what is the point of domestic 625, exactly identical to PGZ04A except AHEAD which makes little difference, so pretty much repeating themselves. And also, consider the fact that the domestic option never used that camo.

It could also be the export one, cause other wise the in files FB 10 won’t be used and doesn’t fit the theme which is IR + Datalink.

1 Like

Yep which is the only thing that would make it even 10.0 lol, the missiles are already bad at 9.3.

1 Like

625 did not use FB10, but 10A

CS/SA5 is 625’s predecessor, yeah, it’s name is type 625(E) or PLB-625, CS/SA5 refers to older one with only 30mm gun and a smaller turret and manpad, chasis changed from VN-1 to MV3.
625(E), a newer changed version, has 25mm version and 30mm version in same name.

2 Likes

We have many things in the files that aren’t in the game, such as Python 4 missiles and SPICE bombs, or the Mirage 2000 CS3 as another example. Being in the files does not necessarily mean its coming, either soon or ever.

And that won’t go more than 3 km.

FB-10 can’t be used by Type 625/625E
only FB-10A
FB-10A bigger than FB-10

1 Like

35mm AHEAD spaa is available at 8.7 and HN-6 are already beyond bad at 9.3, so how would combining these suddenly make it 10.7 lol?

Well pretty stupid to add a vehicle with the weapon, and not add it, instead make a meal out of what essentially the identical capability of the 04A.

and more importantly, IRIS-T SLS suggests we may have a theme of DL+IR, this exactly matches 625E with FB-10A, they can make a great couple.

1 Like

>OTOMATIC 11.7

need me to remind that?

Dont overextend yourself, watch it be LOBL.

and we seldom have 2 SPAA with almost same character in same TT.

image

That matters to Gaijin to no extend. Like how they ignored 2S6 can’t use 9M311M1, cause it didn’t have direct radar guidance.

‘Seldom’
We can’t assume everything will be a one off. Like ‘Gaijin made a mistake’ and stuff.

image
this is even worse, SIDAM 25 being a higher BR despite having no tracking radar and relying purely on IRST, with objectively worse gun

1 Like

well I said seldom, not no

and ZA-35 is often used as autocannon ifv