HN-6 already in the game at PGZ-04A
FB-10 never used by Type 625/625E only FB-10A
1 Like
Gszabi’s discord leak only talks about the 630, which isn’t really helpful. I also have not seen datamine that would indicate either of them personally
That doesn’t exist. China only operates 625, which does not have 30mm option. Also the posted pic is of 625/630E.
1 Like
I think after Scharnhorst but I apologise to German players because I fully intend on NUKING it’s fire rate to the historical 70 seconds.
1-st picture CS/SA5
2nd Type 625E that have options 25mm/30mm
1 Like
Bold of you to assume Gaijin will nuke reload rates, it has been mentioned time and time again that it’s a balancing tool otherwise we’d get Sturmtiger with 3 min reload rate or KV-2 with 2 mins reload.
2 Likes
Talked abiut later the 630 is a spelling mistake its the 625 manpad
Looks like we ain’t getting second devblog today. Well, not complaining
It is possible that it could be a modelling error, since the chassis is identical. They could’ve worked on the 625/E early on and reused the same hull for the CS/SA5.
1 Like
Same chassis though. The domestic 625 also has that.
Wouldn’t make sense to add another ~10.0 SPAA to china though.
1 Like
So, Mike could just type CS/SA5 not 630
For my opinion it is Type 625E with 30mm
Gap filler between Tors and Antelope, probably.
CS/SA5 is the more technically correct name, 630/625 or whatever is a relatively misleading name since it is like a group of family for a particular vehicle.
It’s basically like calling the Leopard 2A5, A6, A7, Leopard 2 because they are of the same chassis.
2 Likes
No way it would be after the Antelope though, like the HN-6 are so shit it would not be above 10.0.
30mm AHEAD gatling
1 Like
It has 30mm gun, better than the Antelope by a mile.
1 Like
I’ve just woken up and see a SA vehicle so it’s devblog time baby
11 Likes
But the FB 10 is in the game. It’s in files, pretty stupid to not use it when making a vehicle no? Also just as a reminder, what is the point of domestic 625, exactly identical to PGZ04A except AHEAD which makes little difference, so pretty much repeating themselves. And also, consider the fact that the domestic option never used that camo.
It could also be the export one, cause other wise the in files FB 10 won’t be used and doesn’t fit the theme which is IR + Datalink.
1 Like
Yep which is the only thing that would make it even 10.0 lol, the missiles are already bad at 9.3.
1 Like