Not so much surprised, but giving Sweden a worse copy of a US aircraft twice in a row is just insulting.
Super Hornet should be able to wait, the US has twice the amount of 14.0 that any other nation has, not even counting China and Japan without any.
So? F-22 at 13.7 because it doesnt have HMD?
Maybe 13.3, no HMD is just sad for a 13.7
hope your pillow is warm
well Super Hornet only has better radar and a2g ability really (radar only if block 2 or higher). ideally US would get an F-16 (its been a while) or another F-15, since they almost never add same type 2 updates in a row (every F-15 has been spaced out by at least one update between, same with F-16, F-14, and F-111)
Thats the Yamato
CF18 HEP II for britain when? Just a legacy hornet with the super hornets aesa radar and other various upgrades
not quite
Ah yes I can’t wait for any of the dozen ways they could buff the F-15J(M), because it’s not like the F-2’s gonna be 14.0.
That will be 90 bucks (or more like 130 or so for u canadians) and 1 kidney
Hmm, never really noticed that…
Anyways as long as it’s not better than what Sweden’s getting again it should be fine. I just feel bad for them if that happened again right after the last update.
isnt CF designation canada?
Yes
Pretty sure its the AN/APG-79
Ya, CF-1XX is how Canada calls it’s fighters after the late 1960’s. One for the few good things the came out of that event(most of it was bad).
This is not the Bismark, Bisamark have 4 canons not 3
Bismarck has 8 guns, 4 turrets, yamato has 9 guns 3 turrets
AN/APG-79(V)4
It has GaN T/R modules instead of GaAs on standard 79. Iirc to give equivalent performance in smaller jet
Depends, with the 6 + 4 loadout from the leaked model and the prototyped HMD (if that’s enough for them) I could see it barely being 14.0, mainly because they made the Finnish Hornet 14.0 which would seems about like a sidegrade.
Either that or it’s the China thing where it’s 14.0 on dev, doesn’t perform and then gets lowered to 13.7
since when is canada a subtree of britain?