Everyone needs that, not just UK.
And the Challangers are pretty good. The maps are just bad for these vehicles.
Reject modern, return to 70s/80s/90s.
ehhhhh I would argue 2nd or 3rd worst MBT in the game atm its a mix of always having hull ammo, terrible hull armour, tiny ready rack, one of the worst rounds on an MBT at top tier and its god awful speed
What?
Tastes differ
I mean taste has nothing to do with facts lol I enjoy them none the less but they are some of the worst MBTs at top tier
Yet again… an opinion.
Don’t get me wrong @Smugspite, the only people i hear complain about GB are people from this thread and some discussion articles on the Game Discussion.
Mostly people from the UK say the Challangers are bad in game.
do I need to go and list the stats to show that they are some of the worst MBTs at top tier?
It has good speed,turret armor, gun depression, reload speed. It feels a lot better than T-series, Ariete and even Abrams
The only one that gets me confused is the RAH-66. Wasn’t the Comanche the first attempt of crafting a stealth chopper?
The best solution right now would be add Australian Abrams AIM and the upgraded version of AIM i mean Abrams SA and in the future Australian SEPv3 or even add indian tanks for example bhishma mk3 with better shells there is a many options to make UK tech tree more competitive on top tier.
Don’t get me wrong, stats really don’t matter.
The Lecrecs have worse armour, 10 mm more pen and go just as fast as the Challanger 2E, yet are considered one of the best MBT’s ingame.
1 Like
are we playing different tanks lmao?
one of the only good things (ignore how big the mantlet and hull are)
its the same as every western MBT…?
for 4 shots, and its not even that good anymore most nations are now down to 5 seconds on an aced crew with bigger ready racks and better ammo
1 Like
I would expect the badger to be a bit worse than the VBCI premium (worse survivability, worse reverse speed), so I don’t expect it above 9.7. Considering the 25mm light tanks at 9.3 (VBCI and ICV), I think we can expect the 30mm badger at 9.7
1 Like
probably yeah. Not because of the stats, but because GB doesnt have a lineup at 9.7.
They always do that.
I think u just don’t know that Challenger is not a Leopard
2 Likes
the 2E and to a lesser extent the BK are the only “good” ones and even then the Leclercs have far better endurance with a 22 round autoloader with the same reload, I also wouldnt call the leclerc one of the best tanks in the game anymore dont get me wrong its good but its not as good as it was when it was first added
We’re so back
13 Likes
Is an opinion. Having noticed the Challangers ingame, they are pretty solid. Even the four 11.7 challangers that the UK gets.
The turret has amazing armour, far better then the lecrec. One round is all it takes for the Lecrec to blow up (believe me, playing the Lecrecs was awful).
EDIT:
The main issue is that maps are being disgned for Russian tanks.
No flanks, head on engagements, limited mobility and close quarter combat.
Just like Italy, Japan, GB and France, these tanks are designed to do that.