And yet T80BVM is only 7th in 12.0 win rates at 55.1%. The top 3 being the French 2A6 at 59.8% (because Rafale), Leo 2A7V at 58.4% and Strv 122B at 57%.
I suggest you log in now, take the Leopard 2A7, and see it for yourself. I’m writing here out of disappointment and, frankly, frustration. This has been going on for a week. I don’t know where or who provides these statistics, but the reality is a bit different.
Yep, try fighting the FRS.1 with a loaded A-4B ingame and see what happens
1 Like
You may consult StatShark - See All Player, Missile, and Vehicle Statistics
Which is far more accurate than the older Thunderskill because they collect all stats instead of only taking those that registered for it.
The numbers tells a better story. Less open to empirical feelings.
1 Like
The cope is strong with this one.
I could go and type a big and detailed reply, but it would just get rightfully flagged to hell for being off topic (which it would be). So I’ll keep it short:
Besides the planes/CAS part I just read a lot of skill issue.
now that we’re getting the last (real) WWII battleships, and also a malvinas map, how long do you think it’ll be before we get some type 42 class frigates? Considering they were recently added to WTM.
@Motherhen357-psn
I mean if you go to Statshark you see France top tier is always higher WR than Russia.
Rafale in GRB is extremely good because of the closer engagement ranges, MICA becomes very powerful. Moreso than even R77-1s.
And then the flight performance of the Rafale is just chef kiss. Add on the 360 degree RWR and you have so much information to play around with.
3 Likes
I’d rather get as built HMS Blake to have a good 5.7 and not to lose half my firepower in order to get a helicopter (or a harrier). its a cool retrofit irl, but has no positive game purpose at all.
And you also get a 360° Maw if somebody manages to get an IR missiles off on you
I’m really happy that you’re so invested in the game. But it’s a game, and skill matters a lot here. I don’t sit with a calculator or watch YouTube videos on how to hide my tank on the map. Apparently, that’s what skill is built on. But you’re free to express yourself however you want and keep talking about how great everything is for you in random battles.
and the best radar at top tier for actually finding things to shoot at
It’s the same gun and breach as the Bismarck. Same shells too because russia never got round to making their own 15" shell.
Same gun, same shells. Different turret when you account for power assistance and autoloader. Bismarck and tirpitz have what I have nicknamed the normal turret. Gneisenau and PR-69i use the Drh LC/34 in what i have nicknamed the lightweight turret. To ensure structural compatibility half of the autoloader had to be sacrificed. RoF was the same as on coastal mountings, which achieved a peak reload of 60 seconds, and sustained of 70 seconds.
Yes I believe sevastopol is in the same boat as gneisenau.
the heavy weight turret would have broken the ship, this much we know. I personally do not know if russia planned to use the german loading mechanism or their own, absence of info, take the closest external case, which is gneisenau and 70 second reload.
3 Likes
Ridiculously huge, but anything bigger than h-41 is straight up either fake or was drawn up by an office of people who had no actual sway or ties to the naval design bureau, they were just looking busy to avoid a trip to the eastern front. their designs are structurally flawed and also have no basis in reality.
Gaijin:
“15 second reload you say?”
I asked smin, its reportable, they could jsut ignore it but lack of power assistance does not mean no power assistance, this would be the first ever case of them knowingly exceeding an autoloaders peak fire rate. it still has an autoloader assistance, its just slower and bad. To my knowledge they’ve never exceeded an autoloader e.g giving the soviet ones a 5 second reload, as its not possible mechanically.
Lowest they could get if you accounted purely for the autoloader is probably like 40 seconds and that would account for the crew somehow teleporting shells from autoloader to the breach.
Thats a guess by the way, no document i have read straight up says this. Oh and 1940’s printed german is hard to read, im only B2…
So fingers crossed then, but I can only imagine the thread spam with figures reported from Bismark. So have something saved in a notepad for C&Ping into those threads :D
IJN: Hold my beer
5 Likes
Well if you google the gun and do any research navyweps clearly state it. if people care enough to moan about them being different i’d hope they at least would try and research why first. I did not just get told this, i looked and found it, and now have been trying to validate it with the autoloader plans and the rof figs from the coastal batterys
It’s curious how the human mind works
you have to be a very brilliant naval engineer and, at the same time, a complete idiot to build something like that.
5 Likes
No, mostly idiot.Even I could probably draw something like that if I was really good at drafting