When did I say it was meant to simulate real life. Adding US vehicles does not mean this game is attempting to be a 1:1 simulation. Also the F-14D wouldn’t even be particularly OP, Germany and Britain really shouldn’t get hornets anyways since they have absolutely nothing to do with them.
F-2 and Mirage are reasonable though
So let’s remove the French aircraft in Britain, Finnish vehicles in Sweden, Thai vehicles in Japan, Pakistan vehicles in China, Swiss aircraft in Germany, Indian and some South African things in Britain, BeneLux stuff within France then shall we ?
Oh and by that we should put the Marut event on permanent hold because Britain had nothing to do with it.
@Smin1080p_WT Would this be do able ? : P
Wouldn’t be too opposed to that, but all of those are from subs or for Pakistan, China seems to be the home for their stuff. Germany really shouldn’t have a hornet it had nothing to do with MiG-29G and EFT. Same with UK but Shar, F3 Late, Gripen C, and EFT as existing options
You say that as if a decent chunk of people wouldn’t be fine with that lol
Well they need to grow a spin then either like it or don’t play it,
And as for you, of course you wouldn’t you only play the US, I’ve seen your vehicle count and what you played. You know nothing about other nations needs other than I don’t like sharing my tech.
The truth is mate, other than mains no one gives a two hoots if you wanna complain about exports then ring up the US defense department and cry down the phone.
After all this game is own by gaijin and at the end of the day it’s up to them what’s get’s added and what doesn’t.
Ok since it doesn’t matter so much for people who have multiple nations, why not go and play the US if you want hornets?
The only ones I would say aren’t accurate are the J-10C and German IRIS-T SLS
The J-10B would be more likely since it was leaked by @/gszabbi99 back in November alongside the J-11B.
Germany also never used the IRIS-T SLS. Maybe the SLM would fit?
Otherwise those all seem like they can fit.
I doubt IL IS-3 is the last leak, and I am still inclined to it being a Japanese or Soviet ship, but I cannot see any possible candidates that match the leak. I have tried kagero class, takao class, sovietsky soyuz and stalingrad, none of them worked.
Hardly a talking point is it, If I wanna play US tech then play US tech, so what if I wanna play the Marut ?
By your own rules I would have to wait for an Indian independent tree, oh wait I can’t because guess what India has exported it’s vehicle pool.
So by that again Indian tech is split between nations an unique things can’t be added.
India is already a sub though. So largely irrelevant, playing US to get hornets still works
Btw when you talk about other tt needs and stuff, ever consider ringing up said countries DoD and crying down the phone? Maybe even fax them a drawing of what you’d like them to make
No it’s not, you just said Britain has nothing to do with the Hornet, with that also applies with the Marut so stop using subs as an excuse
Way ahead of you on that
Oh speaking of sub’s then if you want to use that excuse then fine, remove the P-16 and the Swiss Hunter from Germany, they are not a sub yet so there your argument is still busted
The UK just needs its top tier IFV man, im bouta crash out😭😭😭😭
I’m going to point out “having nothing to do with X” hasn’t stopped Gaijin before; there are plenty of examples.
And on the Horent, Gaijin with the last update, Russian stream said they were considering a Hornet(it was on the table because they heard the wants) for UK & Germany for a later update.
That’s still true. India is just tied to UK through an official subtree. However, no hornet operator is
They just picked the closest nation ig. I personally disagree with the hunter, but P-16 is fine imo since Swiss are close to Germany and it isn’t taking away a vehicles unqiuess (or vehicle in general) from a developer tree for no good reason
Ajax?
You do know that sub announcements or not vehicles can still get stuff that they have nothing to do with them, right ?