You don’t need to be able to pull as well as the Typhoon when the AIM-120 will do the pulling for you.
With a whole 32G, nice, going to do plenty against the typhoon who fired and is now fully in the notch while you’re still entering yours
Why should it be unrealistic?
Tell that the iranisn f-14 or russians X su 24 variant
It would definitely fill the gap between the Sea Harrier and the F-35 for the naval fighter line
3 Likes
So would Rafale or su 30.
India has a lot air options
That gap is no argument
1 Like
MiG-29 too
- 35, not 32,
- If you don’t have enough time to enter a notch, that’s an issue, not an issme. Get better at positioning yourself.
2 Likes
And both are far more controversial than an australian hornet (which bear in mind uses british missiles too, making it’s addition to america unfeasible)
1 Like
Again Smin said to us not everything from our subs will be added, even though India does use them it’s not a blanket guarantee it would be added.
2 Likes
what about India mig-29k or SHar FSR51
I don’t have any positioning issues, just confused as to your claim here?
They are part of uk sub tree. Australia isnt.
Gajin made it clear that indian additions are way lore likely then australian or canadian ones
[Insert my previous statement here]
Barely coherent, fix the grammar and repost please
- The grammar is fine. Get better at reading English,
Future premium/event vehicle
@Smin1080p_WT the brits are at it again claiming the world
Seems like for the X time (i stopped counting)
You need to clarify that australia and canada are not sub trees and that india and sa are the british sub trees
Funny that australia day consisted of vehicles almost entirely from Britain, and features the motto of the RAAF (shared with RAF), they are far more linked than you are letting on
Is an ‘issme’ a new english word i missed?
Ah, you think that Australia is a sub nation of the UK. That tells me everything you need to know.