That help is already there tbh, harukaze and murasame are adequate to handle that, and kako is enough to get through rank 3
They had assisted loading mechanisms that gave them that rate of fire, its partly what made the US 5 inch such a good dual purpose gun
it’s different, GCS-1 is not IIR seeker, more close to ir missile’s non-imaging seeker, not suit for ground target and it’s way of using also not suit for the game
the similar one is ASM-2, which should come with F-2
though it also has some problem with ASM-2, it’s normal way of using is LOAL, the missile fly by IOG then the seeker lock the target by it self.
Yeah, it shouldn’t have capabilities that it didn’t IRL however they may as well keep it in the game even without A2G capability, like the AS.34 it does nothing, but it does nothing in a fun way
Anyways the missile wasn’t why I pinged you, it was because a US jet under the Norwegian flag got added to Sweden, it’s more proof of a united Scandinavia under Sweden
F-2 has sniper pod which can be used to most likely slave the seeker. plus the ASM-2B is GPS guided that can be added too.
EJ Kai can probably use it but most likely would have to get closer for better targeting.
2 Likes
bla bla bla ships bla
1 Like
Whilst we don’t rule out further ASMs and similar weaponary in the future, for now its just Penguin coming for the Norwegian F-5A.
6 Likes
Officially, the G4M1 from the game is a 1943 configuration. This means that G4M1 1941, G4M1 1944, G4M2 model 22, G4M2 model 22 Ko, G4M2 model 22 Otsu, G4M2a model 24, G4M2a model 24 Ko, G4M2a model 24 Otsu, G4M2a model 24 Hei, G4M2e model 24 Tei are missing, G4M3 model 34, G4M3 model 34 Ko, G4M3 model 34 Otsu
1 Like
so this is more in line with a test to see how these will function, somewhat akin to the event Tornado
With the current state of the game why would they come ???
A lot of work needs doing before they get introduced, theres still some planes that where on the original roadmaps still not come and that was 12 years ago lol
What is the logic behind the decision to (now for a 2nd time) introduce ASM’s into event vehicles that will just simply be inaccessible for most players who don’t wanna spend money or sell their soul for 2 weeks? I mean, can we finally get some tech tree ASM’s?
These weapons are generally much more niche in their role and use. Generally event vehicles allow us to explore variants of vehicles that offer something unique, without taking away a vehicle that could have otherwise been in the tree. Both this F-5 and the Tornado MFG follow that same idea.
Starfighter MFG when?
1 Like
I wonder how many more years of ASM testing Gaijin needs to finally add them to the tech tree
The Marineflieger was added in December of 2022 btw
If they actually wanted to test them, they would add naval targets to ARB, but what do I know, I’m not a developer after all…
1 Like
Yeah…
@Smin1080p_WT
Howcome Germany, Russia, France and Great britain get domestically build weaponry, but when it comes to Japan they dont?
The AAM-3 and 4 are also not accurate yet.
2 Likes
If we are seeing more ASMs,.can we expect Sea Eagles soon?
2 Likes
But in this case you are directly taking away an F5A which is equipped with an unique weapon from the swedish tech tree? I get the entire “event vehicles need to be unique” gig, but you are sort of contradicting yourself here. It’s a similar case with the tornado MFG, while you aren’t taking the plane itself away, you are taking away the unique weaponry it gets from the tech tree, which automatically makes it inaccessible for most players. Weaponry that can also be useful when playing sim, i myself have been waiting on RB15’s for the longest time to be added to the AJ viggens specifically for anti ship operations in sim, yet all we’re getting are event planes.
1 Like
Japan has domestic wepaonary. You just listed a couple above.
It would be a lot less niche if we got more missile boats :)
Or even if air rb maps included ai naval targets.
4 Likes