That won’t work and won’t be a gaijin idea as then they might as well be a joint nation
1 Like
I mean, the main reason for my omani subtree suggestion is they have quite a few unique mods of british cold war vehicles that would be interesting.
Such as;
Provost T.52 = Provost trainer with MGs and Light bombs/rockets
Strikemaster Mk.82 = Strikemaster flown by RAF pilots (similar precident to the NK Mig-15 in game)
Hunter (Oman) = a unique, nameless upgrade to most of Omans Mk.73 and FGA.9 fleet, giving them countermeasures and AIM-9Ps
Jaguar OS/OB = Jaguar GR.1/T.2 airframes built for oman, fitted with AIM-9Ps and GR.1A countermeaure pods
And so on…
2 Likes
Well yeah, it would effectively be the subtree rework idea, just with the subtrees mirrored, the issue is that the subtree rework is never going to happen, so with the current state of things Australia is just going to be another Canada and both nations will be depressing
Though it’s kinda funny how people say the UK don’t need a Hornet while at the same time the US demands both and a whole line for their exported stuff.
So the UK getting about 5 variants = bad and doesn’t need it
The US getting 50 ish variants and locking other nations out = good and a fun idea
3 Likes
I’m going to be frank this idea is still as dumb as when I first saw it if you ask me.
At that point just make a joint Canadian-ANZAC tree as a new independent TT if you’re adding a new tab altogether(that isn’t the sub-tree rework but that still doesn’t make that idea possible as it just gives the room for a sub-tree, in the one collection of nations, not joint between multiple hosts).
And it really only exists to appease US and Gerrman’s mains, and their feeling nobody else.
I mean, there are countless examples of prototypes and vehicles in game, such as the Mirage 4000.
Plus, you can already split it into 3 variants in britiah livery alone:
Spoiler
Early/Prototype:
Late/Production:
Night Attack (IR nose)
2 Likes
Yeah but then gaijin constantly doesn’t do that. Look at most sub trees and plenty of the vehicles they add don’t bolster a existing ground lineup or fix a missing hole for CAP/CAS
1 Like
More strikemasters would be amazing
1 Like
I never said anything about bolstering or filling holes, I said stuff not in the main tree, ideally “C&P”
Was just more pointing out gaijin will ignore C&P if they don’t deem a nation as worth adding. 2S1 Finland and Germany, Germany is lacking a 8.3-8.7 lineup now that the A1A1 and Tam are both 9.0 and their Soviet equipment and cold war stuff would be nice to see added. My point is gaijin likes to say they have rules but then does a 180 and ignores the community when they get called out for not following them.
1 Like
Yeah, that’s great and all but I was talking about the F-16 in the Omani subtree suggestion
Again, more so just stating that even C&P can be ignored by the snail
1 Like
I know, but when given the option between adding something new vs something they already have, they generally go with what they already have, not adding every possible C&P vehicle to every nation is an entirely separate and unrelated thing, especially as I was talking about a “potential” new subtree, not an already existing nation
as it should be, strike eagles are the best looking eagle derivative lol
F-15C get BOL pod and AN/APG-63v3 radar, maybe new vehicle if it gets AIM-120C-5 and AIM-9M-9
So, you don’t want the F-22 or better F-15s then?
best LOOKING
I was more leaning i to the idea that it applies to all subtrees. New and existing, i feel its pretty likely we will see more subtrees pop up this year and i think the above logic will apply to them
@BearHasLanded you know i think i know 2 people more stubborn than Quartas, AlvisWisla and Shay imo are tied for 1st with Quartas in 2nd
the fox I’d agree with, but the roo I’m not so sure, it’s definitely close xD