Ships: as discussed here, MN Strasbourg(gaijin office is located at Karlsculhe)
The tank: the most common takes are Boxer 155, ASLAV-25, BMPT etc, palmaria or centauro 155 as well
1 Like
F/A-18 is cold war, just late cold war, and we probably aren’t getting that version
Actually good point.
@Smin1080p_WT is there any plan to make the blades produce a larger radar signature?
Skyguard on a boxer chassis, its could still be a light tank like the 2S38 and not breaking the no high-tier event AA rule
1 Like
Not the one we will likely be getting ingame
literally what I said
My bad, skimmed over without realizing
Cant wait for another Magach for Israel as thats what they’re totally lacking atm… 🙄
Magach marksman would be welcomed NGL
1 Like
Nothing in the shorter term.
3 Likes
Ok thank you for the insight.
Idk why you got flagged but you post was in bad taste. Just a tip. Most people don’t like it when you just assume you own them which is what your post was essentially saying when you first made it. Again Hägglunds produces and makes the CV90’s. There is no reality where it makes sense to just assume because BAE and britain are close that they should get the Swedish designed and produced CV90’s. Only ones that should ever be given are joint projects with the British military like the CV90 trials where they used the CV90 chassis with a british turret.
AIM-2000 late? AFAIK there’s only one AAM IRIS-T version currently, with a block 2 being under development.
Any plans to look at adding the Gripen C’s 5th pylon for A2G munitions? Its been over a year since it was passed yet stuff like the rafale gets 2 additional missile pylons in a week? It would be nice to see that added since we could see it on the Gripens displays
The point of the post was to find out what the situation is, people say the CV 90 is Swedish then I here people say they are built by BAe and when I ask about it people don’t read what was said and just start being mean or dumb
Would any of those really play that different compared to their current in-game variants tho?
I mean, fair, the ASLAV-25 is not a SPAA, but the other ones are just the same as the in-game variants but with bigger guns
Well, assuming that SPAAs are mostly out of question, except for hybrid capable vehicles that can be designated light tanks. I would also say the ZBD04 with HJ10 ATGM, but that seems even less likely.
1 Like
odd i dont see nay updates for the failed anti cheat system when are we going to get an update about that part of the game or just the reporting system?
Maybe you should’ve looked into the history of the CV90’s? Hägglunds was bought by BAE but CV90’s are exclusively made by the swedish branch and development is done by them specifically. Outside of business ties they have no tie to britain as again its not a british segment that makes the CV90’s. You would’ve saved yourself some explaining if you had bothered to look it up. Instead you essentially went about it in the eorst way possible by saying the UK owns the CV90s and the people making them. Its pretty fair why people reacted the way they did.
I don’t see why the AFT-10 would be unlikely. What would speak against it?