I’d argue that having a Hornet in the British and US trees and a premium one for the US would make them the most money
1 Like
Ok stop talking now
Eh, all depends on what the snails flavor of the month is
stop twisting words, i said British IR missile that had a US seeker. just a little point to add onto US involvement in that aspect of the Australian hornet
Or maybe US gets 1 hornet and stops complaining because other nations get stuff they exported, seriously its getting old at this point
2 Likes
i dont mind sweden getting one, they have the actual subtree to justify it.
but the UK does not
1 Like
I’m just saying, if the seeker is the only claim to the missile, then the fact that the exact same one is in the AIM-9X should matter
everything that separates the ASRAAM from the 9X is British
Eh i mean the first comment on the suggestion for the Finnish Hornet is literally about it should be a US only vehicle like squadron or prem
what the devil have I come back to…
And not only that but ruined the RxR over a course of a few months for clearly baiting us into a flame war
Dont you think thats just a bit hypocritical given youve been complaining for the last 3 days about a hornet going anywhere but US
1 Like
Children bickering
1 Like
the usual
I mean the UK still has existing Canadian and Australian vehicles in our tree, it is just so frustrating that their addition is haphazard and met with so mich backlash when US mains cope about things getting exported and used by alot of different countries. You don’t want other people having them? Don’t export anymore. Simple
1 Like
Two words
US MAIN
1 Like
you called?
Spoiler
its scooby dumb scooby doo’s cousin and in the only episode I’ve ever seen him in he used the phrase “you called”
it is annoying to see US jets spammed all over the place. but its effectively confirmed for Sweden.
Definitely seems like a u.s. squadron vehicle
Oi don’t you start lol
Stop exporting military vehicles then
1 Like