Well this stroll feels above average in post production lol
maybe this for USMC C+? (they can leave out APG-79)
Swiss Hornets had CAS and they did testing iirc just they dont use them for CAS irl. Its was part of their upgrade program. Finnish Hornets and their MLU is a separate thing all together
2 Likes
Will they ever fix the CH3s damage model to fit the visual model?
A question that future generations may be asking
ok, i thought that becuase hornets have been exported without a2g, the same coudlve happened with swiss ones
I think we’ve got a week to go still maybe on the 25th we will see something
If there is a version of the C+ that doesn’t have the 79 then sure, that would be the best fit.
JHMCS is going to be needed, but they’ve already shown that they’ll add it to aircraft that don’t have it with the F-16 OCU, so we’ll have to wait and see
1 Like
Finnish Hornets had to have their avionics Ripped out because of their treaty with russia which prohibited them from having fighters with CAS and limited them to a certain number of fighters.
1 Like
there is, original C+ didnt have 79v4 and only until more recently they put them there
there is good chance that there was a C+ in between new upgrades that had the other stuff but not the radar so wouldnt be totally unrealistic
1 Like
FA/18a can put out 17750lbs of thrust via afterburner for one of its engine shouldnt have that problem
600 new posts, leaks?
I wonder if that event will end up without an announcement for the rest of the world again
just your faucet mate
1 Like
someone said CRAM and Pantsir wasnt CIWS
1 Like
It loses about a 100 km/h speed per second it spends in a turn, It’s not getting that speed back anytime soon as it doesn’t have that good of a thrust-to-weight.
1 Like
RxR = leaks, son which universe are you in lol
4 Likes
Exactly idk why he keeps forgetting thrust to weight. F18 just isnt equal to the current 14.0 fighters
13.7 or 13.3
gosh darn it no leaks even now… I think I just wake up everyday and search youtube for leaks