Would be very disappointing but probably going to happen
1 Like
Eh, we’ll have to see, the snail likes to say they have patterns and rules and then does a 360 and ignores them so…
1 Like
They’ve done it that way quite a few times, even when they add to separate models of the same vehicle
1 Like
Biggest funny would be Su-30 and A6 gets added and then the F-18 takes over as the joke addition to the leak lists
1 Like
Sir, you’re talking to the guy who is currently begging for the Sherman V and Chaffee for the UK.
I’d love more M8s.
1 Like
Again id rather see nations who are actually lacking lineups and stuff get more. Besides i thought UK mains want another 8.3 spaa :)
Ii want 5.x and 6.x and 4.0 spaa on nations with no spaa or glorified TD spaa’s lol
Devblog in 3 hours.
Spoiler
Source: Trust me bro
4 Likes
Didn’t do this for the different F-16A, F-15A, F-15C, F-15E, Tornado IDS, Eurofighter etc variants that came in the same update. I doubt they’ll suddenly make different devblogs for the identical F-18Cs.
1 Like
If quartas is right about the Vark one then that means they’ve done it like that twice. Both the Gripens on launch and the Vark were setup like that so again. No reason to say for certain they wont do that again. It may just be unlikely
Yea but gaijin allready leaked the f18 with the su30sm
Actually now that I think about it aren’t the Finnish and US hornets both probably going to be C? Then they might put a picture of the finnish one but it’ll just be F-18C devblog
Eh, depends on if gaijin wants to add late US C models with the upgraded engines or not. I assume they will but the bigger question is if gaijin adds MLU I or MLU II
The differences between the F-111F and 111C are bigger than the differences between the Finnish, US and possibly Swiss F/A-18C. They’ll likely just be the same aircraft copy and pasted across the 3 trees with a different camouflage, so no reason to have a split devblog really.
2 Likes
Usually when it’s the same aircraft for multiple trees with slight differences, they do the devblog on the big nation, like the F-15E was specifically for the US
2 Likes
Again depends on if they add MLU I or MLU II, if we get I then its a C model hornet that weighs less from having its ground avionics removed. Which makes it better at dealing with aircraft. Additionally gaijin will need to figure out if they are going to restrict the Finnish and Swiss Hornets to their historical loadouts or give all of them the same loadouts for Ground and air.
Can’t wait for the Devblog to hit and see all the Germany mains in shambles over the lack of a Swiss Hornet
1 Like
Again imo they should get it, but i dont think they need it right now since they just got the EFT, but considering the bugged radar on the EFT i think its pretty likely they will get it additionally if gaijin lets it have CAS functions then its even nore vital since the EFT kinda sucks rn
Just to add on to this, i do wonder if we will see an expanded Swiss tree soon
honestly that ones likely gonna happen cause of the old gajin saying you just got a top tier aircraft u dont need one this patch.
like it is custom germany gets the vehicle they didnt develop themself a patch later then everyone else.
more likely we get it in the summer patch propably. if gajins didnt completly change the plans now after they decided to add the efts earlier then hornets
Have them fix the EFT then? A Hornet couldn’t take the Typhoons place.
Also, to be completely honest with you, I don’t care that they don’t have Su-34/F-15E tier CAS, coz that sh** ruins GRB.
I don’t see why we would see an expanded Swiss tree or even a Swiss subtree