i am not avoiding anything, i am just following the set of rules gajin has set out over time,
anything else like you dont accepting them aint my problem
We having a conversation or playing dodgeball here?
Be careful of following the masses, sometimes the M is silent.
because they are sub trees? i made that one clear already
sub trees are the highest implementation rule
australia and canada arent subtrees you cosntantly seem to be forgetting that. i only named vehicles that arent part of an official subtree
So the J-11A, which is objectively worse than the Su-27SM in every way except MAWS has to be at the same BR as the Su-27SM because the average J-11A player is better than the average Su-27SM player.
And this makes sense to you guys?
i am german, i follow the rules easy as that, you have a problems with rules aint my problem
Clearly haven’t been reading the R&R thread.
Who want to atm anyway lol
dont bother, even when i said i have no problem with a standalone anzac tree and support it they completly ignore that part
What like you ignored naval because it proved you wrong?
Then there will be people coming and say, “well the devs will definitely have personal bias based on their own experience! they will not have a just opinion!”
Bruv, it is called common sense.
Gaijin CONSTANTLY breaks these so called “rules” you’re touting, which are all based on some post or wording or previous action by the company. The whole point of suggestions and wishlists is to express what we want in the game, not mimic what came before.
If we lived by these rules, we wouldn’t even have air to air missiles in the game, since they said they would never add them.
is that the moment i wipe out the dev statement how he says sweden is his favourite tech tree lol?
There are no rules that Gaijin made, only guidelines. Hence why they don’t follow them often(unless it is for the big three(this goes both ways) wich rules then only exist/don’t exist if it can be used to give them anything at the expense of others)
Took the words right out of my mouth
- worse radar
- worse rwr
- less missiles
- worse engines
Same BR tho
That is the dev team, not the balancing team. There are no vehicles that is inherently overpowered or underpowered, just a vehicle that is overtiered or undertiered.
Which the overtiered vehicle mostly reside in Britain.
Ehhh i feel a grey area exists for vehicles that have such drastic performance swings that they can only be undertiered or overtiered
Like the A10C
Does that change anything? No.
Good point.