NO LEAK YET?
AHHHHHHH
lol
I’m fine with the odd one every now and then its the spam which is a bit annoying
1 Like
I have to agree, we should have a break having one every update just seems like a buzz kill.
those are not my wishlist, i said they may be in next updates, i only play germany
actually im talking about next update, not my wishlist
currently i dont have any wishlist vehicle
I think there’s nothing wrong with GUESSING and it shouldn’t be counted as wishlist
last time i had a wishlist vehicle was a top jet for germany
Also the XF-2 that Gaijin sadly skipped with lower performance prototype J/APG-1 with ~800 active T/R modules and missiles limited to SARH.
Might be a nice aircraft to fill the void between F-1 and F-2 that the F-16AJ would leave if they remove it.
4 Likes
Yeah boggles my mind not even a XF-2A as been added yet
3 Likes
well done, you got what you wanted, my posts have been flagged
i dont send anything in the forum from now due to lack of freedom of speech here, I HOPE at least my last comment wont be removed lol
good luck you all
Forums have rules, freedom of speech (or lack thereof) has nothing to do with that
AIM-9L is not planned as it’s currently sitting in a balanced position on its current BR and adding a more advanced missile type over what it currently has would increase it’s efficiency and likely lead to a BR (and therefore Rank) increase. So there are no current plans for this.
AJ.168 will need some further investigation.
2 Likes
Kind of sad that this still is the stance on the AIM-9Ls for the FGR.2. We have the FG.1, which is 99% similar, so having the FGR.2 at a higher BR, but with AIM-9Ls would be neat.
1 Like
Got nothing do with freedom of speech, you’ve been posting stuff that has nothing to do with this topic.
I do find it amusing the amount of people who don’t actually understand what freedom of speech means, and how it doesn’t apply to private companies, nor is it freedom from consequences, but I digress, that’s off topic.
3 Likes
yalll gonna buff the pheniox aim54c to its IRL specs because its kinda silly to keep it in a nerfed state when you add a better variant on another plane cough cough FAKOUR 90 ??? just becaus its dual plane doesnt mean you cant add the G pull as a place holder you added yak 141 with missiles it couldnt carry
1 Like
meh, mostly a LAV-AD sidegrade
1 Like
Would you like to explain why R2Y2s doesn’t receive the BR change, like move to 7.7 or 7.3? I noticed that there are a lots of players who agree with that before removing the R2Y2, or do you already abandon these aircraft?
2 Likes
Then can it be lowered to 11.7 where it would actually make sense in placement with such close proximity to aircraft like the Tornado F3 and F-16. Its closest equal, the Mig-23MLD is already at 11.7
3 Likes
I really don’t think the naval F-4s should go down to 11.7, they definitely deserve 12.0 when compared to the aircraft below them. You are right tho, they should be at a lower BR than the F3 and shouldn’t be just one step below the F-16A.
Note that the F-2 also has higher wing area so it should be a trade off. F-16C would have better high speed and energy retention, but the F-2 would be able to run circles around it, especially in low speed stall fights as it’ll have a lower stall speed and ability to pull higher Gs/AoA.
In theory anyways. Gaijin models how they model and F-2 flight performance is more or less classified so Gaijin has free reign.
I do think the F-2 will be pretty competitive in WVR and competent at BVR, even if the F-15J(M) will be better at that.
2 Likes
Yeah, I’m aware.
I’m just thinking for general BVR as WVR dogfights don’t occur nearly as often as they do at lower BR games.