Germany needs a sub-tree as much as the US needs one AKA none. They have no room, any nation that could would be relegated to unavailable vehicles.
also placement rules? there are none. Gaijin has given vehicles to nations that rejected it, and never even tested it when nations in game where operator nations of the vehicle and they didn’t even get it.
But if that’s the case then we ask for a sub-tree. “but the UK is asking for the world”.
So just admit it, you hate Canada & the ANZACs, after all, you’re acting like you should be our MASTERS.
After all, we are only allowed to ask for a home after Germany gets: All our MBTs, IFVs, APCs, Jets, Props etc.
Was quite literally a cost thing. The RAAF didn’t want to pay for F-18F/G integration. The Aim-9X literally only has cost going for it as in all other aspects it either only meets or is worse than the competition. The RAAF used ASRAAM until their F/A-18As reached end of service life.
Germany has as many possible additions as uk and france. Only reasons geemany has more vehicles overall is because it exists longer in war thunder as a nation.
Any sub tree of france or uk could be filled with indiginous vehicles.
Thats not an excuse to bot give germany a sub tree
It’s indeed a Badger IFV, the turret is extremely distinctive and the only other IFV fitted with that turret has it rear mounted, the IFV in the decal has a centrally mounted turret like the Badger.
It wasn’t integrated fleet-wide due to politics and money. So unless you want to tell me that Gaijin simulates the American Congress budget constraints, then the F-14D is getting Aim-120 AMRAAMs.
Gotcha, when I made the initial post people were still debating its identity, and I wasn’t familiar with any of the vehicles so I wasn’t going to fully commit.
Germany has been in the game just as long as Britain has, but they were one of the majors with the US and Russia, whereas Britain was a minor with Japan
I would swap the Tejas and the Rafale, Tejas is a completely domestic aircraft so should appear in the tree. And a Hawk 200 would be better than a Hawk 100 as a high tier SQN vic. A Hawk 100 would play extremely similarly to the Thai Alphajets, the Hawk 200 has a radar with the options of ASRAAM/AMRAAM/Skyflash along with late aim-9s so could be a good 11.7-13.7 depending on loadout.
Yes it was “to be” compatible as that was the plan, but that plan changed and it was definitely at the least never cleared, if compatible at all without modification
You need a source more recent than 1981 given that the missile didn’t enter service for another 10 years
