Or, it can be a skin for the US one to make more money
fake AIM-9X (tracking suspension) (like brimstone (SAL))
Or they add another one to make even more money.
You must be new here. Its an accepted fact that britain deserves everything.
Other nations don’t have anything to fill that role either. There is no need to fill such a hole, especially not if it requires equipment that isn’t used by the main nation or its subtrees.
True
1 Like
Then maybe it’ll be the P2? They don’t show the different AIM-9M subvariants (AIM-9M-1,2,3 etc) so could be that.
Nope, but still an F3. So has the same poor dogfighting performance.
Its a canadian designed and built vehicle. If it gets added, it will get added to the UK TT.
But why? Given the number of operators, adding the Canadian one just to screw Britain out of it just seems petty.
Again. Never asked for an F-18E. Just an F-18A for high BR SARH
1 Like
Such as? Our one real subtree is all unique pretty much
All the more reason a CF-18 doesn’t even have to come to the game at all.
Britain I think is the only nation without
US: F-16 + F-15
Germany: Mig-29 + Mig-29G
USSR: Mig-29 + Su-27
Britain: Nothing
Japan: F-16 + F-15
China: J-11 + F-16
France: M2K + F-16
Sweden: Gripen A
Israel: F-15 + F-16
6 Likes
They do show subvariants for the AIM-9P and we currently don’t have any of the AIM-9M subvariants
GDLS designed and built you mean, GM Diesel before them. Also, the US is the most major operator of LAV 3 (Stryker), while UK doesn’t use them at all
1 Like
Good point. Hopefully they’ll be P-2
24 Likes
Ok then So Smin denied the Harrier Gr.5
So as a fun ai play so don’t take this 100% but I asked it to find a candidate that would fit for that replacement.
"If you’re looking for a Canadian or Australian aircraft to replace the Harrier GR.5, you’ll want something that fits a similar role—preferably a ground-attack aircraft or a multirole fighter with good low-speed handling and close air support capabilities. Here are some options:
Canadian Options:
- CF-116 (Canadair CF-5A/D Freedom Fighter)
- A Canadian-built variant of the Northrop F-5, capable of ground attack.
- Light, maneuverable, and equipped with bombs and rockets.
- Not a direct replacement in terms of VTOL but works as a light strike aircraft.
- CF-18 Hornet (CF-188A/B)
- Canada’s primary multirole fighter, based on the F/A-18A/B.
- Superior speed, agility, and weaponry compared to the Harrier.
- Strong ground-attack capabilities with guided and unguided munitions.
- Lacks VTOL but is a solid choice for a conventional replacement.
Australian Options:
- Dassault Mirage IIIO
- A licensed-built version of the Mirage III used by the RAAF.
- Used for ground attack and interception roles.
- More suited for high-speed strike than CAS, but still a good option.
- McDonnell Douglas F/A-18A/B Hornet
- Used by the RAAF as a frontline multirole fighter.
- Shares the same strengths as the CF-18.
- Works well as a Harrier replacement in attack missions.
- Aermacchi MB-326/BAe Hawk 127
- Used as a trainer/light attack aircraft by Australia.
- Not as heavily armed as the Harrier but useful for CAS.
- Good for a lighter, more cost-effective ground-attack role.
Verdict:
If VTOL is essential, no direct replacement exists from Canada or Australia. However, for conventional multirole and CAS roles, the CF-18 (Canada) and F/A-18A Hornet (Australia) are the best substitutes, offering better speed, range, and firepower than the Harrier GR.5. If you want something lighter, the CF-116 Freedom Fighter or Mirage IIIO could work."
1 Like
Can you all shut up about what vehicles should ho where… FOR FIVE MINUTES!
Just move on ffs
1 Like
Right, I didn’t consider the MiG-29 and F-16A ADF as SARH slingers, considering they only get two SARH missiles
Tragic
2 Likes
That sucks. That would have been a fun replacement for the Gr7 since it got Over BRed
2 Likes