Its one thing that you can potentially acquire most (but not all) US aircraft by playing other nations.
Its another if you could acquire Britain(and by extension Germany and Italy) (Typhoon), Sweden (Gripen C), France (Rafale) and Soviets (Su-30)
All in a single TT
Australia isn’t a sub-tree Britan isn’t guaranteed their vehicles.
Not all no I agree, but most certainly
But the fact still supports that the only other country to have Australian tech is the US with a grand total of 1 out of 14 we have.
Holy loadout
There is no certainly at all. It will purely be based off Gaijin’s decisions. If they are feeling generous to the UK tree they may get it. But there is nothing that makes them have to get it.
Not a confirmed subtree
And where may I ask does this is stated ?
And yet I see ppl defending CF-18 and Australian F/A-18 to UK, when in the end that might as well be a Su-30. If you don’t like the idea of one nation having access to other creator nation top tier when they never used it, then hornets shouldn’t be in UK
All the times WT community mangers came out and said Canada and Australia are not sub-trees
We don’t want both we just want one, Australian is the user I want
And? Others want the CF-18 to UK instead.
There is also the Australian F/A-18 super hornet
Ah now you see that not the original point you stated since you said “based off and feeling generous” that got nothing to do confirming Canada and Australia are sub-trees or not.
The point that you’ve made was they will add stuff on a whim not confirmation, if that make it clear
AIM-7P, huh?
What is it with people using the royal we when trying to exclude India or Canada or Aussieland all the time lmao.
He just wants Australia lmao
Isn’t that the same “leak” we had years ago ?
They gave the UK the F-111C out of generosity. What do you mean? Nothing I have said changed.
If a C&P is innevitable, then might as well make it a reasonable one.
RAF/FAA pilots from the UK actually do have tours with the USN in the F-18. So its not entirely unreasonable.
When looking at the tree as a whole, the CF-18 fits better with the rest of the aircraft.
CF-18 actually fills a bit of a void for a higher BR SARH Slinger. Su-30 would be a 14.0+ thing that adds nothing other than an alteranative to the Typhoon.
Given the UK already has the ADATS and probably will get the LAV III. The addition of 1x CF-18 + maybe 1x Canadian Leopard creates a decent Candian Line-up within our tree. Given the CF-18 adds nothing to the US TT, it seems pointless to add it there.
I dont want a million C&Ps. Especially given just how much is missing or poorly added that britian operated, let alone exported. But there are a small handful that were and are acceptable. F-111C we got in place of the F-111K. CF-18 and a Leopard. Everything else should be native built from Canada or Australia or British in Origin.
That is a far stretch from people wanting Top tier Britain to be Typhoon, Gripen, Rafale and Su-30
Datalink AIM-7M iirc
