I think it’ll be one of the best cap in the game. 10 ARH against high and slow targets lazing are free kills.
no i am just saying his statemetn of the 800 ish spawn points aint wrong if the ammo belt get included
1 Like
First sorry for the misunderstanding.
Second no one uses other belt options in order to not increase their SP cost.
4 Likes
Indirect fire system when?
Hopefully never
I support Omani sub tree.
1 Like
There’s no point of bringing better ammo belts in GRB.
@Smin1080p_WT Will there be a dedicated DEV Blog about this when the time is ready? Or will it be a suprise until DEV Server or live?
2 Likes
Modern version of the Tail Spin event lol
As long as we can leave out the F-16s, I support that too.
I’d love to use artillery as artillery.
1 Like
nah subtrees deserve all their vehicles, if we start picking and choosing they dont have any reasons to be sub trees to begin with
5 Likes
Man am I glad Gaijin seems to think differently about that.
We can all agree with that hence why the sub tree tab must exist than a half baked line
5 Likes
Though Gaijin also seem to agree that subtrees should actually add something the main tree doesn’t have, and if they can do that through “C&P” then all the better.
i am all for china getting abrams, uk getting rafales and su 30s, japan getting vt 4s
Because they are subtrees, they have a home in the game
End of the day canada and australia arent subtrees, thats why they go where the vehicles belong.
If they just start adding “specific” thing dont need to add subtrees at all
They’ll leave it for a teaser
1 Like
Fair, tho that still doesn’t include everything from a subtrees nation
Tbf even I, (the creator of the subtree suggestion) dont particularly want their F-16s, i guess as a premium they could work, but in reality, whilst they offer some very interesting british aircraft for mid tiers, they dont really offer much after that.
1 Like
No but in the case of Oman, that would most likely include the F-16, given it’s the only airframe Britain doesn’t otherwise get