SEPv3 will be more than enough of an improvement over the SEPv1 that it will help US top tier. Sure it won’t be a world beater MBT like the 2A7s/122s, but it will contest them far better than the current SEPv1.
3 Likes
It can’t be added, it didn’t exist. They mounted missiles on the aircraft that it could not use as a proof of concept/demonstration. There was no new radar installed, no new HMD, and no new radar missiles as was proposed for the upgrade that never occurred. It was essentially something that could be considered a mockup upgrade, and as such it can’t be added to the game ever.
1 Like
Not with the turret ring weak spot. Like the CR2 the M1A2 is humped unless Gaijin actually fix the model
If it ever makes it out of CDK jail that placement would be great, along with the foldering of the BO’s
I wouldn’t say it’s a C-5/7 counterpart tbh
Probably closer to the AIM-120B
just because the last heli which was added was the Mi-8 which was in september 2023, Update 2.29 Sons of Attila? nah…
1 Like
germany helicopters are low in number, we need more
just no, Heli Spike for the win
Maybe throw a premium Tiger UHT (PT5R) in there too =D
It’s faster but falls short in every other category
1 Like
The reason the F-14 didn’t get AIM-120s is because the Navy already planned to axe the F-14. They didn’t see the need to pay for the 120 adaptation when they aircrafts service life was pretty much already over.
3 Likes
PARS are also missing its 8km Range and its Proxy fuze
Reports for it are made and accepted
1 Like
They didnt test it.
They literally just mounted missiles to a MiG-23 as a proof of concept, there was no integration whatsoever.
2 Likes
In-game 120B is the exact same.
And irl I’m pretty sure 120B is just electronics upgrade
someone said on internet that the reason they chose modern platform over mig-23 was the “expensive” changes to mig-23 to use r-77. so i think they surely tested it
speed is s key thing
They didn’t, stop lying. It was a proposed upgrade that wasn’t integrated into a single MiG-23 platform. This is a demonstration of what the upgrade COULD have entailed, but nothing was ever applied to the existing MiG-23MLD airframe to allow it to use said weaponry. It could use the R-73 however, as later MiG-23MLDs were modified to use such a weapon later into their service. The R-77 and R-27 could not be used at all however.
If you have anything that can prove the contrary (there isn’t anything other than images, which are secondary sources and not only prove nothing, but are not up to gaijin’s standards of implementation), please feel free to prove me wrong and show said sources.
3 Likes
There is a difference between testing and not going forward cause of cost and not testing cause of expected cost.
They didn’t. It’s as simple as that. It was a proposed modernization that never went anywhere, unlike the MiG-21-93 program.