Yeah it would finally complete the usa 8.0/8.3 lineup because the Huey was moved down as well.
does it get the 40 apds ammo like the gepard or use its own feeding system?
8.3 then
No no no no no no! Please no don’t add the proxy rounds I need a 8.0/8.3 spaa. 😭
my guy it gets proxy rounds its not gonna be below 9.0 lol
No, it should be 8.3
if the suggestion for it is to believed then yes and since it uses the same gun it’s 100% fair to assume it has the same capacity
(it also apparently has HE-VT but i can’t find anything about it so i’m going to ignore that)
2 Likes
I love engineers. Very intelligent and autistic people with a nose filled with pure Peruvian. And then you get that out of it.
1 Like
No it would be the same Br as the Sergent york sadly
If anything it should be ostwind 2 BR without proxy so German planes can get shot at by 37mm for a change lol
Yeah a lot of ally SPAA is missing their air burst shells.
1 Like
am expecting more the R-73M or R-74 the first variant of it which is literally a renamed R-73M than the R-77-1 (they already mentioned that they have intentions of add this IR missile in the CM Disclosure N4), i dont think that gaijin is ready to step up talking about FOX-3 but when we talk about later 4Gen IR missile i think that we are more than ready, people needs to assume that IR missiles in the exact moment that FOX-3 got added the IR ones got moved to a second place right now IR missiles are a complement that would help you in a possible scenario of being forced to a close combat and nothing more and with new IR missiles being added it will be the same, this is not gonna change the first missile you are gonna use is the FOX-3 always.
1 Like
As long as the current generation of Abrams is in service, then US top tier will never be saved as there are no considerable improvements made to boost the Meta stats in wt besides outright penetration
why i barely see yak141 in the game? lol of course i mostly play ground mode
in wikipedia it says yak 141 is able to carry kh25mt (tv guided air to ground missile)
Last year’s devblogs started on the third full week of February. So yeah next week seems extremely likely.
M1 CATTB however, have you thought of that?
No need to worry about turret rings, since the turret is unmanned.
1 Like
If you look at what was said in the CM Disclosure it wont be. It was said there will be an article put out outling what will happen and how they will work and too watch for the article…probably not going to show up before that article.
The MiG-23M already is a pretty early variant of the MiG-23. While the pre-production MiG-23 and the MiG-23S could be interesting, I can’t see why they would be needed, as the pre-production MiG-23 would be limited to guns only and the MiG-23S would carry the same weapons as the MiG-21S/SMT (probably without flares or chaff as well).
I feel like those would be better used as premiums or event vehicles.
A MiG-21 at BR 10.0? There really is no need for that when you have one at 10.3 and one at 9.7. I don’t even know if there is a variant between the MiG-21S and the SMT that would be different enough than either of them to warrant a BR that isn’t 9.7 or 10.3.
I don’t see any reason to add a MiG-23 with R-73s either, really, but I suppose they could add a MiG-23MLD (late) at 12.3 with R-73s
A MiG-27 at 10.0/10.3 definitely isn’t necessary, as the Su-17M2 exists, but they could get a MiG-23BN, which would be 9.7. This is basically the same case as the MiG-23 with the MiG-27K/M being the second variant of the MiG-27, the actual “early” variants of it would be the MiG-23B/BK/BN variants