@efetenekeci So because Gaijin loves domestic vehicles they hate them? Your post is wild.
Your post is just spreading hate against France, Sweden, and Italy. They got over a dozen new unique vehicles last year, and except for Hungary, the other two subtrees are half unique.
Then you hate on Japan in your last sentence.
Zero Japanese aircraft are getting ignored; development is not instant. Development takes time, especially for the obscure for War Thunder aircraft Kawasaki P-1, one of only 2 ~8.0 jets Japan can get from Japan.
Oh, and you know who complained about J35s? Players. We all complained about J35s being added without flares, and Gaijin listened to that feedback.
Gaijin also listened when we complained about J37s without flares which is why we’ll never get JA37A/B.
No, it is not. We’re supposed to load four under the wings for long-range attack missions, long-range travel where attacks are expected, etc… but I’m having trouble finding any documentation that clearly states that they can’t be launched or that they can be launched.
The only thing difficult about making Britains top tier tanks competitive is Gaijins unwillingness to fix the plethora of things that are wrong with the Challengers
All but 2 aircraft options for Japan would be <7.0 in BR or >8.7
Japan made very few aircraft that are weak enough for 8.0 but not too weak.
RN Ghibli, Typhoon, RN Francesco Caracciolo, MS 444, MAS 441, Alcione, Alano, AMX A-1A [export], RN Bolzano.
None of those aircraft would be 8.0. T-33A would be 7.0 maximum.
And Fuji T-1A is 6.7 - 7.0 capabilities with AIM-9s.
T-1B would definitely be 6.7 maximum.
Would this work as a source? It’s a document stored in the United States Department of Defense’s Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).
There are also various books that mention wing-mounted AIM-120s, but could someone check the sections about armament in books specifically about the F-22? Online sources only confirm that it can be equipped, but what’s important is whether it can actually fire them—or if it has done so.
