I don’t think it’s extended at all in that image. I have never seen any image of it in a lower position, even the plan shows the retracted mast at a similar height.
1 Like
or brit
Spoiler
5 Likes
skyranger or mgs look the most likely
personal would be mgs, skyranger doesnt make sense when we would receive a service version end of this year
“possibly”
Why everybody was trying to make a giraffe-tank at some point?
And it was so mid when it arrived. The mobility and firepower were not good enough for 10.0.
No CITV
No US APFSDS and the Tows just fall out of the tubes.
TOW 2B is still buggy.
Very disappointing
being cappable to fire at a target , while having the crew in safety of cover
4 Likes
I think early atgms were a bit hard to use from ground level(Its just my guess)
1 Like
Is su24 confirmed on the other list?
The mock up Tea flavour
Meant to fire PARS 3 LR but cancelled due to delays with that programme.
European defence plans against a massed soviet ground invasion where to take large advantage of the rolling hills and firing from behind ridge lines and such to allow for easy retreat to the next defensive position
3 Likes
Why I want either the Ajax or the Warrior CSP … that has CITV and mega APFSDS … like the CV90 … I mean if you have enough pen why take an atgm that doesn’t work right?
1 Like
??
fixed it
it dont really need to come it wont change much and russia can go a single update without new top tier jets
Oh yes. Su24M <3
1 Like
Neat, thanks for a tidbit. And i guess we just sticked to ground judging bu depression on our tanks.