Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

1 Like

Is there a leak list for new ordnance coming into the game?

Uhhh- We really use nicknames as answers?

I had to think for a moment that the A-10 is not known by its official name Thunderbolt II but by Warhog.

USS Tennessee… I REALLY hope it’s the WW2 refit… one of my favourite-looking vessels ever 😍

This will finally give the U.S an actually GOOD ship; much like Mississippi, with the outstanding guns, shells and armor, but even better-looking and better anti-air and secondary suites… still slow ass reload, but all other advantages will make it worth it!

4 Likes

She Is THICK.

1 Like

Nobody is going to replace their pantsir with the Osa, unless it comes at a lower Br, that solely depends on how trash the missile performance is.

I mean, pumas aren’t large cats either, but here we are

Thanks

yes, but they are still to close, I guess 11.3?
if it can get booster on all time long untill 12km+, it may be even better than pantsit within 10-12km

Any theories on the two siblings from the east defeated by Finland? If gzabi said they didnt mean kv1 for that particular riddle…

Ammo racking this thing will be fun :P

If it’s like USS Mississippi, the stupid barbette ammoracks found on Arizona, Alaska and Nevada (their biggest weakness) will finally be no more… HEHEHEHA

Main difference is that the Su-25T usually doesn’t face Pantsir, seeing how easily I shoot down the current A-10s with that thing I don’t see it being much more than doa.

both japanese ICVs

1 Like

Both the Japanese ICVs, the APC variant lost out to the patria in the Type 96 Trails,
So the Two sibilings (the ICV and the RCV), which are both Mitsubishi Heavy industry projects, and based on the Type 16.
The cousin is the Mitsubishi MAV which lost the Type 96 replacement trials.

4 Likes

Why would they add both?

Yes

1 Like

meh, just in time really… look when last years first devblog dropped. 1,5 weeks from now ish

well, it’s pantsir’s problem, not A-10c’s