True…if i wouldnt hate Gaijin for putting Czechoslovakian vehicles into USSR, it would do the same
2 Likes
Lmao the challenger 2 beat out the Abrams thats pretty funny
1 Like
Seriously. The SU34 should have been added, or just give the SM and SMT SAPSAN-E.
No way does the SU-24 do anything other than look cool
1 Like
Beating out a 2A5 (by a miniscule amount) but losing to a 2A4 that’s technologically still stuck in 1980s?
:D
2 Likes
man take a nap we are just making jokes and that’s it, there is no need to take this seriously
I haven’t seen anything reliable to that effect; if such a variant was planned, it was probably abandoned at the development stage like the navalized Ju 87 's were, and like them wouldn’t be viable to appear in WT.
and the fins bought 2A6M2s from the dutch when they got rid of their tanks. 20sec google search. i dont care if that one on the pic is only an NL or 2A6M2. the dutch owned them.
leclerc got beaten by a 2a4 lol
1 Like
thats not a 2A6M2…
???
2A6MA2s didn’t even exist at the time of the Finish Leo 2 acquisition.
sadly that true for nearly every tank
on that matter they are increasing namer weight by another 3t to 64t jesus
Finland only bought 2A6NLs. The Netherlands didn’t have any 2A6MA2s at the time. Well, they don’t have any today either…
1 Like
no they did not… they bought regular ass 2A6NLs
1 Like
Shouting cope isn’t a joke.
2 Likes
Hey, i answer to someone who said Leo and Abrams are ALWAYS better than Leclercs, so i’m not wrong here.
i’ve also said sooner crew impact a lot those challenge indeed.
But that dude don’t trust me when i said Leclercs could stomp 2a5 if it was closer to it’s IRL spec in war thunder, and if you take a look at the horrible reports and what it is IRL vs Ingame, it’s just facts that it’s way behind what it should be.
still quite funny lol
wasnt that in singapore?
they made a meme for giggles, some got offended some got a laugh out of it, some said cope as a joke and for some reason that’s a matter of getting angry over a community for the actions of some and for a joke nontheless?