Why I can’t join any matches? It shows connection to the server is lost.
So USSR will receive yet another SPAA, and USA gets nothing?
Physically, yes, but not genetically.
According to feline taxonomy the Puma is part of the felinae, which are small cats. A Leopard on the other hand is part of the pantherinae, which are large cats
Spoiler
👆🤓
2 Likes
I think we can look forward to the next version
🤪"
General Xian and General Cheng will make China stronger in the next version 🤪
7 Likes
What is the JF17 like in terms of CAS capabilities?
I have China top tier ground researched, but can’t be bothered to play enough air RB to grind out their air tree. So if the JF17 is a squadron vehicle would it be a decent CAS option?
2 Likes
I wish the leak was more accurate than just “French coastal”.
Want to know what’s coming, if it’s gonna start in a horrible state like bluewater, or already gonna have some gems.
Lack of advanced BBs for having more than just food against others countries is sad too.
3 Likes
JF-17 Block 1. This picture only has the chinese made armaments. Pakistan made some LGBs and Standoff weapons locally.
4 Likes
Looks like the child of a Mirage 2000 and F-16
1 Like
Btw Gaijin should add Pakistani Mirages in the Chinese TT.
No. They should go to France.
1 Like
5 Likes
so far just 1 this update, the J-10A. JF-17 blk1 has only ir missile, gaijin won’t get you a squad arh carrier now.
though in the leak, J-10 was repeated this way
it’s possible that gaijin will provide 2 J-10 at once.
the first few pre-produced J-10As which only use PL-11 as PL-12 wasn’t ready that time, and the later ones with PL-12.
theoretically they are just same.
If so, F-16 mlu may get it’s place holder and can get AIM-120, we will see.
not concerned with China
2 Likes
As we start getting into the era of international arms corpos, I really personally believe this should be a more important factor in deciding where stuff goes.
Take BAE and the CV90 for example, modern versions of the CV90 are made by the Swedish devision, BAE Hugglands, there’s not really any involvement from the people at BAE HQ in the UK, ergo all stuff developed by BAE Hugglands should go to Sweden.
In the case of the Challenger 130 I think it should go to Germany, as the work was carried out by Rhinemetall, in Germany, not Rhinemetall UK/RSBL.
Another example would be the Lockheed Martin UK CTA40 modular turrets, they where completely developed in the UK, ergo the prototypes mounting it should go to the UK tree.
2 Likes
Another good example is the US KF41, absolutly no involvement from germany
It wasnt a mock up well the pne gaijin made was but slmeone found evidence of a full scale version that worked like the oswind 2 yet gaijin refuses to see sense
1 Like
Ajax fills a seperate role in the british armed forces, its the scout role that replaced the scimitar the Boxer replaced the warrior el a armed battle taxi…
It’s 50/50 France/UK work, they are also make in France afaik.
And France already have service vehicle using them.
Should go in both TT, absolutly not just for UK.
It depends. As a loyal CN tech tree player, I would wish the premium to be VT-1(A): An MBT2000 but with FY-4 and a higher BR. Though MBT2000 is pretty nice, it’s only nice at 10.7 , a totally Copy&Paste would make it not efficient enough against other Premium vehicles. (And the C&P one would ruin the 10.7 :(