So…
Please can you tell me what are the last things the dev answered about regenerative steering ?
Because it’s a big part of “modern” vehicle, and weight a LOT in general mobility of vehicles in the game.
Is it on work ? Is it abandonned?
So…
Please can you tell me what are the last things the dev answered about regenerative steering ?
Because it’s a big part of “modern” vehicle, and weight a LOT in general mobility of vehicles in the game.
Is it on work ? Is it abandonned?
It has the best climbing ability from the standard Challies.
We have simulated as close to game terms as realistically possible with the known limits and performance of vehicles how they each perform based on the physics model in game.
If there is clear evidence to suggest something can be improved and material from which to base that on, suggestion reports can indeed be made.
there is a reason why the normal challenger 2 was the best one before the blacknight was added
Oh ok, damn that’s sad to read.
When War Thunder 2 with modernised physics models? xD
Are there also any plans for faster reloads when stationary?
Because i wouldn’t mind seeing a 2.3 second reload on my Type-90’s and Type-10’s.
We don’t currently have any plans for this.
Time to side climb in my chally
No this the latest bug report on the CE protection
Challenger 2 OES and TES ASPRO-HMT CE resistance // Gaijin.net // Issues
Hey, i was climbing rocks on Sands of Sinai like there was no tomorrow.
Look at 1:45 (stop the music), no way it can climb like that in WT but videos are not enough, it must be accelerated or idk :p
Man, that video was made in arcade, nothing to be mad about here ;)
Rofl, must be that :D
I think its already been asked but is there a reason on why nerfs are so quick to implement compared to buffs? or sorry “corrections” such as the 1200hp engine of the challenger 3, it was nerfed very quickly, yet like the reports that have been listed say the ERA is heavily underperforming in not just kinetic but also chemical protection and that report has been open for 5 months
I should make a bug report to get the leclerc nerfed based on that one drag race video between a challenger and leclerc (ignore there was a second race where the leclerc hammered the challenger)
/j
Why so impatient. First Devblog will be either boat or ship anyway.
Maybe thursday or friday announced the first devblog season
But I waiting BR change aircraft (1.0 ~ 9.7), ground vehicle rank I ~ VIII and fleet rank I ~ V
It has nothing to do with a nerf or buff and everything to do with how clear cut and conclusive the information is.
A lot of the time people may assume that what they are reporting is 100% conclusive and just needs to be immediately implemented as is but sadly is not and conflicts greatly with other known details.
The HP issue was an example of a clear cut and conclusive report.
I love how you can easily found the one where the challenger win (cold start), but the second video where the Leclerc win on an hot start is harder to found and never talked about xD
idk whats more clear cute then direct quotes from the manufacture considering thats what the HP correction was based on, so I dont see how the HP of the engine can be based on that (when previously it was stated to have been improved) yet a report showing quotes from the manufactures on its protection levels isnt clear cut
like im not trying to start an argument but you can hopefully see from an outside perspective it feels like the devs are far to quick to nerf vics and far to slow to buff them