Yea, that was HUGE
Yes better
1 Like
not as bad as the series of boxer variants, but yeah still bad
1 Like
Mobile moment… sry hombre
I want back to the old forums… At least you saw how big things really were
Its fine
1 Like
35 to the list. It will be perfect, if it will be there thing
1 Like
We are speaking of Gaijin…
Who gave Germany Scharnhorst, Bayern, Baden and Sachsen in a row before most nations had even a single counterpart to any of those;
And who gave Japan Hyuga 2 years before a single counterpart for it arrived…
Naval Top Tier balance isn’t their speciality xD.
1 Like
Just do spoiler on your post. Mods can delete it
Maybe one day people will learn to stop calling updates “bad” simply because they personally aren’t interested in the additions…
3 Likes
be honest that’s literally the reason they didn’t put a break there
which one do you think it’ll be?
Skyranger? Puma Boxer? Lance turret?
My bad then
More like saying T-80U is an M1A1 HC that trades ammo, and turret traverse for more hull armor.
If they are going to implement more Spike-armed vehicles, I hope at least they fix the Spikes so that at least they are minimally functional.
As of now, they are not even a joke.
18 Likes
I hope it’s a mistake, would be so stupid for Gaijin to pick worse variant for Italy, considering its lack of top tier SAM. Romania uses AKM variant, so I don’t see any reason not to add it.
You complain that Italy will get an AK, not an AKM, but you do not notice the absence of the GDR or FRG 9M33M3…
You’ll get a 9M33M2 and you’ll like it
East Germany, Romania (Italy), USSR, India (UK) could all receive the 9K33M3 Osa-AKM. In this particular case, Italy needs to receive the AKM considering that’s all Romania used.
Hmmmm… then what is it?
Or is there a reason we dont get to know the only vehicle that people will play for Japan (since the amagi is going to be a pretty long naval grind - i dont count it as an influential vehicle, since most (if not all people) wont play that thing for the first month+)