Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

Game Discussion General Discussion
3694

I set on Friday

3695

Litening III, doesn’t matter tho, because we aren’t quite ready for IRIS-T and MBDA Meteors

3696

The vilkas is 10.3 and the eitan is probably not much higher. You need to keep in mind that we don’t have sep3, sep4, 2A8, T14, kf51 etc. and top tier tanks should be decompressed aswell making many mbts even higher

1 Like
3697

and Eitan 105 and Sabrah 105 too

2 Likes
3698

any bets on it being completely overpowered and not at all terrible like it is IRL?

3699

True, but most other nation won’t have IFVs that will go beyond 11.0.

3700

probably only russia with their terminator

3701

It’s gonna be a fantasy fiesta and completely broken if the APS works ingame

1 Like
3702

I mean ww2 tanks don’t have issues modelled aswell.

2 Likes
3703

It will be like some top tier aircraft, they might not be on primary performance, but will have something that pushes them up and keeps them going. Like Javelins on the Ajax for example

But I suppose they could be given other capabilies that make them useful

3704

Makes me wish APCs and IFVs could replenish or heal other tankers crew members

3705

I hope gaijin gives tank destroyers something first. Tanks like the archer, m10, nashorn, waffenträger (+ all other slow and lightly armored td aswell) all need some small buff. Doesn’t help that td is the worst tank classification in warthunder

1 Like
3706

I’d give them scouting at the very least

3707

Even just resupply teammaes with ammo would give them a decent amount of value

3708

I would give them the ability to camouflage themself in the current enviroment with a presh of a button and maybe 10 seconds time to fully camouflage.

This would emphasize their role in real life.

1 Like
3709

I would be happier if they would revoke the atgm changes. IFVs were decent before that. Makes the whole debate about the aphe changes useless if gaijin wants realism then they should change aphe if they want gameplay first then they should revoke the atgm changes

1 Like
3710

I wouldn’t flat out revoke the ATGM changes, but they definitely should put more work into them

3711

Seeing how they model spikes, I don’t think Javelins will push the Ajax to a much higher BR. They are called fire and forget for a reason, which is because the missile usually forgets after it’s fired.

3712

Could add Hawker P.1109B with domestic british Air-to-Air Missile (Firestreak)

But decrease BR to 9.3 for 3 modes and removed SRAAM from Hunter F.6 (RAF) ?

RAF version never armed AIM-9B

1 Like
3713

not a thing